SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 16

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 13, 2021 11:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 16 - Dec/13/21
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Dec/13/21 11:48:06 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, much to the chagrin of the member for Kingston and the Islands, who is very upset that the Conservatives continue to expose the Liberal government's soft-on-crime approach, we are going to continue to do that, because we have a mandate from Canadians. We know the government wants to crack down on law-abiding gun owners while letting gangbangers out with a warning. It is no problem if someone possessed a firearm for the purpose of weapons trafficking, no problem at all. The Liberals will continue to push their soft-on-crime approach, a criminal-first agenda, and everyday Canadians will suffer the consequences. It is truly shameful. Hug a thug, indeed. Conservatives will stand up for the victims of crime and for the safety of our communities. In spite of the disorder Liberals look to create in this place, we will not be silenced by their attempts.
152 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Gary Anandasangaree (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Lib.)
  • Dec/13/21 11:49:29 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I am a little speechless as to how to respond to my friend opposite, because there is very little truth in what he said. Let me very clearly—
31 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Dec/13/21 11:49:41 a.m.
  • Watch
I am going to interrupt. The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes just asked me to be very vigilant on the heckling on the other side, and he is doing the same thing. I would ask the hon. member to wait to hear the question so he can answer it. I am sure he will want to hear all the details. The hon. parliamentary secretary.
71 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Gary Anandasangaree
  • Dec/13/21 11:50:04 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, at the outset, let me just be clear: Bill C-22 was introduced earlier this year. It was in our platform. On September 20, Canadians gave us a mandate to reintroduce that bill, because we promised to do so within the first 100 days. That is exactly what Bill C-5 represents. I have a very direct question for my friend opposite. He has not used the words “systemic racism” at all. He has not even acknowledged that systemic racism exists within the criminal justice system. He has not addressed that within his comments this morning. Why has he not included that important term in his speech today?
112 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Dec/13/21 11:50:50 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, the parliamentary secretary is talking about Bill C-22, which is really interesting. We are dealing with Bill C-5. Why are we dealing with Bill C-5 and not Bill C-22? It is because the Liberal Prime Minister, against the agreement of all parliamentarians in the previous Parliament, called an election during a pandemic. He killed his own legislation. He did not want to enact anything he had put forward at the time, because Liberals like to try to confuse motion for action. They get very little done. In this case, it is dangerous that one of the first pieces of legislation they are looking to enact is a soft-on-crime bill that punishes victims and rewards criminals.
123 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Luc Thériault (Montcalm, BQ)
  • Dec/13/21 11:51:58 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I would like to give my hon. colleague a chance to talk about something he failed to mention regarding this bill. Perhaps he has an opinion on this. Does he not believe that, as we face this disturbing opioid crisis, it is important to ensure that addictive behaviours are not criminalized and, with that in mind, the best approach to helping people who are struggling with substance abuse and addiction is to repeal mandatory minimum sentences? That is one aspect of the only approach that works, namely, harm reduction.
91 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Dec/13/21 11:52:52 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, we know that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada has already issued a directive with respect to these types of diversion measures. The effect of codifying them and having Bill C-5 enacted is that there will not be much of a difference between what is currently happening and what would happen as a result of this bill being put in place for those measures. What we would see is the repeal of these mandatory minimum penalties and conditional discharges, weakening the accountability for folks who are committing drug trafficking and drug manufacturing offences. This, of course, is going to gravely impact our communities and have a negative impact on folks who are suffering from addiction. With respect to diversion measures, the ones that are currently in place and the directive issued are appropriate.
136 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Randall Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke, NDP)
  • Dec/13/21 11:54:00 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I feel like I am stuck in some kind of time warp after hearing the comments from the member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes. That speech could have been given 10 years ago. In the meantime, we have had more than a decade of experience with mandatory minimums and we know what they result in. They do not result in less crime. They result in the overincarceration of indigenous people and the overincarceration of Black Canadians. The academic literature is clear; our practical experience is clear, and even jurisdictions like Texas have given up on mandatory minimums as a solution to crime problems. Will the Conservatives join us in the 21st century and give up this dated rhetoric about mandatory minimums that somehow implies that taking them away removes penalties altogether?
138 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Dec/13/21 11:54:43 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, it is incredibly important that we have accountability measures in place. The mandatory minimums being repealed are going to weaken accountability; it is that simple. The crimes that are going to be impacted and the criminals who will be impacted will have been convicted of committing serious offences. Victims need someone speaking up for them. That is exactly what we are doing here today. These crimes, the list I have read out twice, are not minor offences. They are serious and dangerous offences committed by dangerous people. The penalties being repealed serve as an accountability mechanism and should remain in place.
103 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Warren Steinley (Regina—Lewvan, CPC)
  • Dec/13/21 11:55:47 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I cannot believe what I just heard from my colleague from the NDP. If he thinks it is a relic of the past to put people in prison for sexual assault, for trafficking in persons and for kidnapping, I will be a relic of the past for a long time. They just—
55 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Dec/13/21 11:56:08 a.m.
  • Watch
I am sorry. I have a point of order from the hon. member for Kingston and the Islands. I want to remind members to hold off on their thoughts while someone is speaking.
33 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Mark Gerretsen
  • Dec/13/21 11:56:20 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, it is not like me to come to the defence of members of other parties, but what the member from the Conservative Party just stated was a complete, utter lie and misrepresentation of what was—
38 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Dec/13/21 11:56:32 a.m.
  • Watch
That is debate.
3 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Dec/13/21 11:56:39 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, on a point of order, the member for Kingston and the Islands just accused the member for Regina—Lewvan of lying. I am just wondering, with respect to— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
37 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Dec/13/21 11:56:51 a.m.
  • Watch
Given the information that the hon. member was providing, he did not indicate that the hon. member was lying. The hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes may finish.
34 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Dec/13/21 11:57:18 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, with respect to your response, I am sure, if you consulted with Hansard, you would find that at the conclusion of the member's comments he did in fact make that very assertion. The member for Kingston and the Islands said the member for Regina—Lewvan lied. My understanding is that is not how we speak in this place.
62 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Mark Gerretsen
  • Dec/13/21 11:57:57 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, on that point of order, you do not even need to check Hansard. I can confirm that I did indeed accuse the member of lying, based on what I heard the NDP member say and what the member for Regina—Lewvan said. Because it was unparliamentary of me to do so, I apologize.
56 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Dec/13/21 11:58:11 a.m.
  • Watch
There we go. We have an apology in place.
9 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Ms. Jenny Kwan
  • Dec/13/21 11:58:21 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I wish to raise this point of order. The comments made by the member for Regina—Lewvan are a misrepresentation of what my colleague the member for Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke said. We are all hon. members here. We are all hearing and listening carefully to the debate. It is inappropriate and I find it offensive that someone would get up in the House right after another person spoke and misrepresent what they said. I would ask the member to retract those comments.
87 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Dec/13/21 11:58:51 a.m.
  • Watch
The information the hon. member is providing is part of a debate. I want to remind members to be extremely judicious and careful in their comments, to ensure that they are not speaking directly about an individual. I just want to make sure members are very judicious and respectful in their debates and responses in the House. The hon. member for Regina—Lewvan can finish his question.
68 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border