44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 17, 2022 10:00AM
- Feb/17/22 2:18:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we are debating the Emergencies Act because of a political crisis of the Prime Minister’s own making, a political crisis here in Ottawa because of his failure to act sooner.
There is another crisis building across our country that he and his government have failed to act on. Canadians are seeing the rising cost of living impacting them in their homes and in their backyards, in my riding of North Okanagan—Shuswap and across the country. Groceries will cost families $1,000 more this year. Energy prices have reached record levels, and rent rates are skyrocketing.
Constituents have contacted me about house prices going up by 35% to 45%, concerned that young families cannot afford their own homes. Seniors on fixed incomes cannot keep up with inflation, which is now pegged at 5.1%, the highest rate in 30 years.
The Prime Minister and his government have failed to act on the cost of living crisis and have now created another crisis as a diversion. This is shameful. Canadians deserve better.
176 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:20:39 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as a Canadian, I am disappointed today.
This morning, the Prime Minister finally deigned to speak in the House of Commons, this sacred place of Canadian democracy, following his decision to invoke the Emergencies Act throughout Canada. He had a unique opportunity to justify his decision to use this extreme legislation in order to bring an end to the crisis that he himself created. He failed. He failed to demonstrate that existing laws were insufficient to stop the illegal acts.
My question is clear: Why is this government using such radical legislation with the sole purpose of protecting the Prime Minister’s leadership?
106 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:23:29 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, let me say it again: There are no longer any blockades at the border. The issue was resolved without the Emergencies Act. That is the reality.
This is the first time in Canadian history that the Emergencies Act is being invoked. This legislation's predecessor, the War Measures Act, was used only three times: during World War I, World War II and the October crisis.
The Prime Minister said just last Friday that no additional measures were needed, and then all of a sudden on Monday, boom, he invokes the Emergencies Act.
Can anyone in this government tell us what happened between Friday and Monday to make the Prime Minister do such a 180 in just a few hours?
123 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:26:09 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, this morning the Prime Minister contradicted two of his ministers who had stated that the application of the Emergencies Act would be geographically limited. The PM said it would apply to all of Canada. All the border crossings in B.C., Alberta, Manitoba and Ontario have been cleared. The majority of premiers are clearly saying that Liberal government overreach is interfering in their jurisdictions.
When will the Prime Minister revoke this reckless decision and begin rebuilding the trust of Canadians?
82 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:26:49 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, once upon a time the Conservative Party was a responsible party that believed in defending the national economic interest.
I know one former Conservative minister who served in such a government, Perrin Beatty, who created the Emergencies Act. Mr. Beatty said this week that when he brought in the Emergencies Act he knew that there would inevitably be future crises. I spoke to Mr. Beatty today, and I told him about the work our government is doing to defend the Canadian economy.
84 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:27:35 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we do not need the Emergencies Act to arrest those participating in an illegal protest, cut off crowdfunding of illegal activities, hand out fines or protect strategic infrastructure.
For the past 21 days, the tools to address the crisis have been there, but for 21 days this government just did not use them. Does the government realize that the only thing missing for 21 days was not the Emergencies Act, but rather his leadership?
76 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:28:49 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, this is not a joke. The Sureté du Québec has come to Ottawa to save the government's skin.
The Emergencies Act was not needed to resolve the situations in Manitoba, Alberta and British Columbia or to clear the Ambassador Bridge. This is not necessary. The problem is that this crisis is happening right in front of Parliament. Why is that? It is because the federal government has been in hiding for three weeks.
Does the government realize that the situation would have been less dangerous if it had taken responsibility?
96 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:32:39 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister cannot justify the invocation of the Emergencies Act. He cannot tell us what tools he used and what steps he took before deciding to use this extraordinary piece of legislation.
He can hardly criticize us for seeing this as a ploy to cover up his failure to act, his lack of leadership and his negligence.
I want to give him another chance to enlighten us. What steps and measures has he taken over the past three weeks that have failed so badly that they warrant invoking the Emergencies Act?
94 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:33:17 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for her question.
The government is learning a lot from concrete actions that have been taken since the illegal blockades began. For instance, the government has offered additional resources to police forces, which is making a difference. However, at the same time, the blockades have caused the police a great deal of frustration.
That is one of the reasons why we invoked the Emergencies Act. We will continue to provide police services with all the tools they need.
85 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:33:51 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Quebec and other provinces have the situation under control without using the Emergencies Act. In fact, they do not want it. The Prime Minister has been warned.
Will this Prime Minister, who listens only to himself and is introducing emergency legislation without consulting anyone, respect the wishes of the provinces not to have this legislation enforced in their jurisdiction, as is the case for Quebec?
67 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:34:19 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the short answer is yes.
We have consulted with all the provinces and territories. The Emergencies Act is being enforced in co-operation with all the provinces. That is how it works.
Our duty is to continue working with the provinces and territories, as well as with municipalities and police forces, to end this blockade. It is time to leave now.
63 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:34:52 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, for three weeks, the Prime Minister did nothing. He added fuel to the fire by provoking the protesters. He even hid in his cottage during this crisis.
Now he is invoking the Emergencies Act to improve his image. Unlike the Liberals, the provinces have acted and are managing the situation in a responsible and peaceful manner.
Will the Prime Minister confirm that he will not use the emergency powers against Quebec and other provinces in Canada that are opposed to them?
83 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:36:00 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the reality is that the provinces demonstrated leadership in managing the situation. That is what the Liberals lack.
The Prime Minister has invoked the Emergencies Act to offload his responsibility for a crisis that he himself fuelled by stigmatizing the protesters who are here in Ottawa.
This Prime Minister wants to manage the border between Ukraine and Russia, but he is not even capable of managing the street in front of Parliament. That is the reality.
78 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:36:49 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, with all due respect for my colleague, there is no justification for these illegal blockades.
The debates in the House on the pandemic are very important, but the way these blockades are being held in Ottawa or at the border is unacceptable. That is why we invoked the Emergencies Act: to help police end these blockades.
58 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:37:23 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the lack of action from the government has resulted in the reaction to end the protests and blockades by invoking the Emergencies Act. It is the most reactive step taken to date.
Canadians are looking for hope and for a plan. The government decided to vote against having a plan. What proactive steps did the Prime Minister actually take prior to putting in these restrictions?
67 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:40:00 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the National Assembly is unanimous: Quebec does not want the Emergencies Act.
Even though the Prime Minister said that his order would be geographically targeted, we see that it covers all of Canada. It applies not only to Quebec, but also to Quebec infrastructure such as hospitals, dams and vaccination centres.
There is no crisis in Quebec, as evidenced by the fact that the SQ is helping in Ontario. On what basis does the Prime Minister believe it is necessary to suspend fundamental freedoms in Quebec just because he has lost control of the siege in Ottawa?
99 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:40:39 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is not how the act works.
The Emergencies Act was introduced with all the protections in the charter. All the powers, all the authorities and all the measures included in the declaration will apply in a manner that is consistent with the charter.
46 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:41:05 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the situation at the Ambassador Bridge was resolved, as were the situations in Coutts and in Manitoba. The situation in Quebec was always under control.
The only place where this situation is still ongoing is Ottawa, the Prime Minister's own back yard. The national crisis is over. There is no reason to use the Emergencies Act or limit fundamental rights across Canada.
The Prime Minister's opponents are calling him a dictator, which is clearly not true, but does he realize that he is validating their claim? That is irresponsible.
93 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:42:18 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Quebec does not need it and does not want it.
Why is the Emergencies Act being used? According to the act, it is for “the protection of the values of the body politic and the preservation of the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of the state”, but none of that is under threat. According to the act, there must be a national emergency. This is not the case.
The act provides the authority “to take special temporary measures that may not be appropriate in normal times”. Canada’s territorial integrity is not under threat. There is no national emergency. Why, then, use the Emergencies Act?
112 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/17/22 2:58:16 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the government has given itself the extraordinary power to freeze the bank accounts of individuals and businesses whose trucks are blocking downtown Ottawa. That is part of the Emergencies Act, which has been in effect since February 14. Today is February 17.
My question is simple. How many bank accounts of the occupiers in Ottawa have been frozen in the last three days?
67 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
