SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 57

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 25, 2022 11:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 57 - Apr/25/22
Hon. Mark Holland (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:22:14 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, the Conservative Party is playing politics. It is important to understand that this matter was resolved years ago, in December 2017, when the Ethics Commissioner released her report. The Conservative Party is well aware that the Prime Minister responded appropriately to these questions.
46 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Luc Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable, CPC)
  • Apr/25/22 2:22:52 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, in this case, what the reports of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner showed was the Prime Minister's lack of judgment on more than one occasion. The RCMP considered laying fraud charges, but laws prevented it from doing so. The only person who can authorize the Prime Minister to receive a gift is the Prime Minister himself. The Prime Minister cannot be above the law though. How many times did the Prime Minister meet with RCMP officers, and when did the most recent meeting take place?
90 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Mark Holland (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:23:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the member opposite is well aware that this matter was resolved five years ago. The Ethics Commissioner produced a report, and the Prime Minister's response to the matter was very clear. The global situation right now is very serious. Many important things are happening here in Canada and around the world, and I think it would be a good idea to ask questions about those things.
69 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, CPC)
  • Apr/25/22 2:24:11 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we are talking about the RCMP here, not the Ethics Commissioner. Newly released documents from the RCMP reveal there may be reasonable grounds to believe that the Prime Minister committed the offence of fraud on the government, contrary to section 121(1)(c) of the Criminal Code. This was after the Prime Minister was found guilty of accepting luxurious Bahamian vacations worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Mounties did not proceed with charging the Prime Minister because the Prime Minister may have granted himself a get out of jail free card. Did the Prime Minister give himself the power to break the law?
106 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Mark Holland (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:24:56 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, five years ago, a report was done by the Ethics Commissioner. That report made all of the matters clear. The Prime Minister responded appropriately. Again, I will say I understand the party opposite wants to drag in partisan politics and play games, but I would say there are a lot of pressing issues facing this country. We just had a budget tabled that takes critical action on housing, indigenous reconciliation and the environment, and I would think those are important things to be asking about.
87 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Apr/25/22 2:25:28 p.m.
  • Watch
I know we have been away for a couple of weeks and we want to talk to each other, but let us try to keep it down and respect the questions and the answers here at the same time.
39 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, CPC)
  • Apr/25/22 2:25:55 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would love to hear from the Prime Minister on this. His silence is deafening. The Prime Minister was found guilty under four sections of the Conflict of Interest Act. The only reason the RCMP did not charge him was that he is the Prime Minister, so there is one law for the Prime Minister and another law for all the rest of us. The RCMP said the Prime Minister was off the hook because he could have granted himself permission to accept the luxurious vacation gift worth $215,000. On what exact date did the Prime Minister act with impunity and grant himself the power to break the law? What is the date—
117 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • Apr/25/22 2:25:55 p.m.
  • Watch
Where is Justin? Come out with your hands up.
9 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Apr/25/22 2:25:55 p.m.
  • Watch
I am going to put people on notice at this point. Let us keep it down so we can get the great questions and great answers. The hon. member for Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman.
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Apr/25/22 2:26:40 p.m.
  • Watch
Are we ready for the answer? The hon. government House leader.
11 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Mark Holland (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:26:46 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, at a time when we are seeing in Canada incredible economic progress, in fact 110% beyond where we were at prepandemic levels; when we see our GDP exceeding where we were at prepandemic levels; and when we see the challenges that are faced by Canadians here in Canada and around the world, I would expect that in question period we would—
64 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Deputy Speaker
  • Apr/25/22 2:27:09 p.m.
  • Watch
Order. We are on question number five. Do we want to continue? I would really like to get on with the next few questions. I am sure the Bloc Québécois will also want to ask some questions in a few minutes. The hon. government House leader may finish his answer.
54 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Mark Holland
  • Apr/25/22 2:27:36 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, as I say, there are pressing and important matters that face this country and the world. If the members opposite wish to play partisan politics and relitigate something from five years ago, when the Prime Minister has acted appropriately and there was an Ethics Commissioner report, that is a choice they can make, but I would suggest that there are things more worthy of the time in this House.
71 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Alain Therrien (La Prairie, BQ)
  • Apr/25/22 2:28:06 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has been chastised by the courts for appointing a unilingual anglophone lieutenant governor in New Brunswick. Not only is that unconstitutional, but it also shows a serious lack of judgment. There is only one bilingual province in Canada, and the PM finds a way to appoint a unilingual anglophone. We are reminded that he also appointed a governor general who did not speak French in an officially bilingual Canada. When will the Prime Minister stop treating proficiency in French as a second-rate skill and francophones as second-class citizens?
95 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Minister of Official Languages and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:28:43 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my colleague for his question. Protecting and promoting French is a top priority for this government. It is important that our leaders set an example, which is why Ms. Murphy is taking French classes. She recognizes the importance of being able to communicate and converse with New Brunswickers. Once again, with our bill to modernize the Official Languages Act, we will do our part to ensure that this work continues.
77 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Alain Therrien (La Prairie, BQ)
  • Apr/25/22 2:29:18 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, it is quite funny. That is the pot calling the kettle black. Last week, the Prime Minister was up in arms about CN appointing a unilingual anglophone board of directors. He said he was flabbergasted and frustrated, but he himself personally appointed a unilingual anglophone lieutenant governor in New Brunswick and a Governor General of Canada who does not speak French. How can the Prime Minister of Canada be surprised that CN is thumbing its nose at French when he personally is sending the message that French is not important?
92 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Omar Alghabra (Minister of Transport, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:29:57 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we must protect our official languages. This situation is unacceptable. CN Rail is well aware that we find the situation unacceptable and has assured us that the matter will be resolved in the coming months, during the next round of board appointments. We are working on strengthening the Official Languages Act. We expect CN's leaders, including its board of directors, to lead by example.
67 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Ms. Rachel Blaney (North Island—Powell River, NDP)
  • Apr/25/22 2:30:30 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the government admitted its mistake with the GIS clawback and paid seniors back, but the one-time payment had a date restriction. Now, hundreds of seniors across this country are left out in the cold. I wrote to the minister last week about this urgent concern. The Liberals must fix this. It is leaving seniors poor in our country. When will the current government stand up for seniors and start treating them all with dignity and respect?
79 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Kamal Khera (Minister of Seniors, Lib.)
  • Apr/25/22 2:31:02 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we know just how challenging this pandemic has been for seniors. That is why, from the very beginning, we have been there to support them. On April 19, we delivered a one-time payment for those affected seniors. We also passed Bill C-12, which ensures that seniors, particularly working and low-income seniors, are never again impacted by any pandemic benefits they take. We will continue to ensure that we support and deliver for seniors every step of the way.
83 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway, NDP)
  • Apr/25/22 2:31:33 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we just learned the Liberals are backing down on drug price reforms that would make life-saving medications more affordable and save us billions. This means Canadians will keep paying excessive costs for prescription drugs, which are among the highest in the world. Meanwhile, the Liberals choose to protect the profits of large pharmaceutical companies. The Liberals say no one should go without the medicine they need, but this policy choice makes that happen. Will the government get moving on public universal pharmacare so every Canadian can get the medicine they need and deserve?
96 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border