SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 66

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 6, 2022 10:00AM
  • May/6/22 12:07:11 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, the Powell River Salmon Society in my riding is one of several non-profits doing amazing work on local salmon enhancement and preservation, and the minister agrees. Small local hatcheries have not seen federal funding increase for over 40 years, and they were ignored during all the federal consultations. The Liberals like to talk about saving the wild salmon, but they ignore the voices of volunteer-based hatcheries that do the work but are struggling every day. Why is the minister not supporting these successful and existing hatcheries now?
91 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:07:54 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I love that question, because I just had a chance to visit a local hatchery in metro Vancouver, meet the members and see the very important work that they do. The protection of wild Pacific salmon populations is an incredibly important priority for British Columbia. I know that the work the hatchery groups do assists with that. It will be supported by an almost $650-million historic investment in Pacific salmon and salmon enhancement, i.e. hatcheries, as one of the pillars of that initiative.
87 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:08:34 p.m.
  • Watch
That is all the time for question period today.
9 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:09:04 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8)(a) I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 25 petitions. These returns will be tabled in an electronic format.
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:11:56 p.m.
  • Watch
Debate. Is the House ready for the question? The parliamentary secretary to the Government house leader.
16 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:11:56 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I am wondering if you can just repeat the title of the motion that is brought forward. I would like to speak to the bill.
27 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:11:56 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
moved: That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill C-5, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the committee be granted the power to divide the bill into two pieces of legislation: (i) Bill C-5A, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, containing clauses 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, (ii) Bill C-5B, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, containing the remaining clauses of the bill.
101 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:12:10 p.m.
  • Watch
I have the hon. member for Barrie—Innisfil, who wants to speak first on a point of order. The hon. member.
22 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:12:36 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I am seeking your guidance on this and perhaps the guidance of the table. When you asked for debate, I asked that the question be put. I believe I was first to say that. Please seek the guidance of the table.
43 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:12:56 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
On that point of order, Madam Speaker, I would affirm that the member did ask from his seat that the question be put, and that is the reason why I stood. I would like to be able to speak to the motion. I understand it is in regard to the splitting of Bill C-5, and I have some thoughts on that to share with the members.
67 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:13:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
On the point of order, Madam Speaker, I believe I witnessed and saw that the House leader for the official opposition rose first.
23 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:13:23 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. parliamentary secretary just confirmed it, yes. When I asked the House if the House was ready for the question, the hon. parliamentary secretary did say no, which is an indication that debate should proceed, if I understand correctly, and this is the guidance I have received. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.
57 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:14:00 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I am a little surprised the Conservatives would choose to move a motion of this nature. My understanding is that, once again, we are seeing the Conservatives hoping to be able to cause a little confusion and frustration with government legislation. That does not necessarily surprise me, but I must say that I am somewhat disappointed in the official opposition. We started by talking about the importance of Bill C-19. It is the budget implementation bill. That is something that I think Canadians, as a whole, are very much interested in. After question period, we would normally go through routine proceedings and then get back to debate. The purpose of debate today, I had thought, was to continue the discussion on the budget implementation bill. Instead, the Conservatives went into the procedures of the day and pick Motion No. 78, which I will read to see what they are hoping to achieve by this particular motion. It states: That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill C-5, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the committee be granted the power to divide the bill into two pieces of legislation.... Why would the official opposition move a motion of that nature on a Friday afternoon? It is surprising. The members opposite are very much aware of what was supposed to be debated today. Instead, they want to change the topic. They want to discuss separating out a bill and causing more votes on legislation that would ultimately make some significant changes to our justice system. There is a significant gap between the approaches of the government of the day and the Conservative Party on the issue of incarceration. When we think of incarceration, we on the government benches, the Liberal Party, recognize that in a very real and tangible way there is a high percentage of people who become incarcerated in our jails who will ultimately come out of jail. To that degree, we need to recognize that it is better to have a system in place that ensures there is a greater likelihood of those people remaining in our communities and contributing in a positive way. It is important that we recognize that. The Conservatives, on the other hand, seem to want to give an impression that the best way to keep Canadians safe is to put people in jail who break the law and keep them in jail. That is their speaking point. That is why we will often hear Conservatives talk about minimum sentences—
440 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:18:24 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Joliette is rising on a point of order.
12 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:18:28 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Mr. Speaker, I would ask you to call quorum. And the count having been taken:
15 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:18:35 p.m.
  • Watch
I think we have it. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.
14 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:18:54 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Mr. Speaker, interestingly enough, we now have the “double blue”, the “true blue” and the “light blue”, with the Bloc being the “light blue”, as one of my colleagues called them. They kind of like to work together to cause a little bit of mischief. On the one hand there is the Conservative Party, the leading party of the “double blue coalition”, moving a motion to prevent debate, and on the other we have the “light blue” or the “mini blue” trying to look at ways in which we can end the session for the day. It is amazing, truly amazing just how much the Bloc and the Conservatives feel that we do not need to debate Bill C-19. Think about it. The Conservatives are saying they want to change the topic today, as they do not want to talk about the budget. I can appreciate why. I can appreciate why because, at the end of the day, there is so much good news in this budget that the Conservatives do not want to talk about it, and that is— An hon. member: Why are you filibustering? You are filibustering yourself.
207 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:20:12 p.m.
  • Watch
Order. The member has the floor. The hon. member for Winnipeg North.
12 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/6/22 12:20:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Mr. Speaker, technically I am not filibustering because I am talking about what we should be talking about today, which is the budget. That is the thing that the Conservatives do not want to talk about because it is such a good, healthy budget for all Canadians—
48 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border