SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 75

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 19, 2022 10:00AM
  • May/19/22 8:39:50 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, what I would say is that we have implemented a number of measures in this regard to eradicate forced labour. Four ministers have mandate commitments in their mandate letters to move forward with the eradication of forced labour. For me, in PSPC, I am going to do everything I can to prevent forced labour in the supply chains. We have made progress and we are going to continue to move forward.
73 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:40:18 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, the minister notes promises in mandate letters to bring forward future legislation. We do not have a timeline around that legislation, when it comes in, but meanwhile we are purchasing products from companies where our allies have already noticed and said that there is a problem with forced labour in their supply chain. Minister, that simply is not good enough. Does the government purchase any products at all that are produced in Xinjiang?
75 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:40:40 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member has to address questions and comments to the Chair. The hon. minister.
15 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:40:46 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, the member is being selective in repeating the things that I am saying. I am talking about the commitments and the progress that we have made. We have made progress. We have a code of conduct. We have provisions in our contracts that say if forced labour is used, then the contract is terminated. We have extended CUSMA obligations with respect to forced labour. We are moving.
69 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:41:12 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, there are provisions in contracts that allow the termination of contracts, and contracts are simply not being terminated. My last question was this: Does the government purchase any products that are produced in Xinjiang?
36 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:41:25 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, again, when we find out about forced labour issues that are raised to us, we take those seriously. We investigate those, and we will not procure product—
30 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:41:38 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member.
3 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:41:40 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, again, that is not an answer, but on another question, does the government purchase any products produced by Nuctech, and has the government purchased any surveillance cameras or other security equipment made in China?
36 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:41:54 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, with respect to Nuctech, let me say that the safety and security of embassies is important. No contract has been issued. All issues regarding the security will be—
31 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:42:08 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member.
3 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:42:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, I want to be very clear, because I am not just asking about embassies. I am asking in general, across government procurement. Has any part of the government purchased products produced by Nuctech or purchased any surveillance cameras or other security equipment made in China?
47 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:42:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, let me be very clear. There were seven bidders. Three were compliant. Nuctech was one of them, so they are on the standing order but with no call-ups, so there is no contract with Nuctech.
38 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:42:49 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, would the member clarify the question he is asking me as to whether it includes CBSA? Can he give me more clarification there?
25 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:42:57 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, that is the third time I have asked this question. Is any part of government procurement happening from Nuctech, and is any part of government purchasing surveillance cameras or security equipment made in China? I hope we get an accurate answer.
43 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:43:12 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, there are none. There are no contracts that we have procured. If we have procured contracts for CBSA, none of them were from Nuctech. We have not procured from them.
32 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:44:49 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, our interpreters are truly the glue that holds together our bilingual Parliament, and I will be asking the minister questions concerning parliamentary interpretation. Our bilingual Parliament is the product of a strong Conservative legacy. Sir John A. MacDonald and Sir George-Étienne Cartier made the use of both official languages an essential right in this Parliament when they negotiated Confederation; Richard Bennett established the translation bureau, which has ensured that unilingual parliamentarians have had access to the words of their colleagues; John Diefenbaker introduced the use of simultaneous interpretation into the proceedings of this House, permitting real-time comprehension for all MPs, and Brian Mulroney finally entrenched the right to parliamentary interpretation in the Official Languages Act. Sadly, the Liberal government has neglected the interpretation services for this House, which have regrettably atrophied and been overwhelmed. We live in the consequences every day now, and it is just another chapter in the Liberals' democratic decline. Does the minister agree with me that our interpreters are an absolutely essential feature of Parliament, and that we must do everything we can to support them?
185 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:44:50 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, my thanks to the member for his indication at the beginning of the question of where he was going with it. I agree that we have two official languages, and at all times it is important that we have interpretation, especially during the very exceptional circumstances that we have been experiencing. In budget 2021, we recognized the changing needs of the translation bureau and committed $18 million for the translation bureau to respond to a higher volume of translation and interpretation requests, while continuing to support a remote working environment. This is going to ensure the parliamentarians and Canadians receive timely translation and interpretation services in both official languages, as well as indigenous languages, sign languages and other languages spoken across Canada. However, I appreciate the member's question with respect to the stress that is being put on them during this very trying time, because of remote work and virtual appearances at committees. We are going to continue to support the translation bureau, and I want to thank them for the great work that they are doing.
180 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:46:02 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, I am glad to hear the minister's commitment, but her department's record speaks to the contrary. The minister was a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs in 2018 when it reported to the House that the “Translation Bureau...is mandated by statute to be the exclusive provider of translation and interpretation services...to Parliament.” Does she still stand by the view she helped write in the report?
77 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/19/22 8:46:27 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, we want to continuously work with the translation bureau to ensure it can provide the services that are needed. We know there is a stress on the system, and it is actually about hiring interpreters to commit to this. There is a limited pool of expertise in this regard, and we continue to work on it.
58 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border