SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 124

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 3, 2022 10:00AM
  • Nov/3/22 3:10:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, an independent analysis of the Liberals' second carbon tax, the clean fuel standard, has found that it will actually increase net international greenhouse gas emissions. Canadians are struggling to make ends meet and are trying to heat their homes and put food on the table. Why does the government want to add $1,277 to annual household energy costs? What is being cleaned here are the pocketbooks of Canadians, without any environmental benefit. If the government insists on proceeding with this high-cost hypocrisy, will it at least delay the clean fuel standard by six months?
98 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:11:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we are working on many fronts to reduce oil and gas emissions. We, of course, are going to be capping emissions from the oil and gas sector. We are going to be investing in carbon capture. Yes, we are going to be implementing a clean fuel standard. We are also going to be phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by 2023, two years ahead of schedule. We have already got a good start. We are phasing out eight.
80 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:12:27 p.m.
  • Watch
That is all the time we have for Oral Questions today. The hon. member for Churchill—Keewatinook Aski.
19 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:12:30 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, on a point of order, there have been discussions among the parties and, if you seek it, I think you will find unanimous consent to adopt the following motion: That, given that billionaire companies like Irving have been using captive insurance scams for almost 50 years; the CRA recently identified more than $76 billion in unpaid taxes in the Panama and paradise papers, including from Irving; out-of-control inflation is making it hard for Canadians to afford basic—
82 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:12:46 p.m.
  • Watch
I am going to interrupt. We have a whole side here who is saying that they were not consulted and will not be giving unanimous consent, so I am going to have to stop it there. I am sorry.
39 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:15:06 p.m.
  • Watch
The Chair would like to address the point of order raised yesterday by the member for La Prairie concerning alleged unparliamentary language heard from the sidelines during Oral Questions yesterday. Since the alleged events, the Chair has confirmed what was said. The Chair is of the view that these were indeed disrespectful comments. Exchanges between members of the House are sometimes heated and intense, but the Chair expects everyone to conduct themselves in a dignified manner and to choose their words carefully. As I explained in my decision of March 29, 2022, found on page 3739 of the Debates, and I quote: “We are all here as elected representatives and each of us is entitled to respect. Personal inflammatory language has no place in our debates.” We have been duly elected to fulfill our mandate and represent our constituents. Our presence in this chamber is legitimate and appropriate. I thank the members for their attention.
157 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:15:09 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill S-5 
Pursuant to order made on Thursday, June 23, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at the second reading stage of Bill S-5. Call in the members.
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:30:18 p.m.
  • Watch
Pursuant to order made on Thursday, June 23, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion to concur in the first report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs.
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:42:39 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank you for your ruling on the point of order I raised yesterday regarding unparliamentary language uttered by the member for Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation. However, I had also asked for an apology from the member who made the unparliamentary comments. I would like to take this opportunity to ask him to withdraw his remarks and apologize to Parliament.
66 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:43:20 p.m.
  • Watch
Does the hon. member for Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation have anything to say? He has nothing to say. The hon. member for La Prairie.
25 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:43:44 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we heard comments that were clearly unparliamentary. You agreed that his remarks were unparliamentary. If he were a gentleman, the member would stand up in the House and apologize for making those unparliamentary remarks.
36 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:44:03 p.m.
  • Watch
I cannot force him to do so. The hon. member for Mégantic—L'Érable.
18 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:44:08 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise to ask the government the traditional Thursday question. We are all preparing to return to our ridings for this very important week, when most of our colleagues will be marking Remembrance Day to honour the veterans who have served our country, and especially to honour the memory of those who have given their lives for the freedom we enjoy in Canada today. We still have one day tomorrow, prior to that week, as well as the week following Veterans' Week. I would like to ask the hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader to give us the details of the upcoming schedule.
107 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:44:50 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, indeed, we will all be returning to our ridings next week to pay tribute to those who fought for our freedoms and the values we hold so dear in Canada. Before that, today we will be hearing the fall economic statement shortly. Tomorrow, the first order of business will be a vote on the ways and means motion regarding the fall economic statement. We will then return to second reading of Bill C-27, the digital charter act. When we come back after the break, our intention will be to immediately return to the fall economic update. We want to give the Conservatives as many opportunities as possible to speak to it so that hopefully we can vote on it in the fall and not the spring, which we did last year.
134 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:46:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-20 
Madam Speaker, I am very pleased to debate Bill C‑20. We could call this take three, because the government has wanted to pass legislation for this matter for some years, but neither Bill C‑3, which was introduced in the 43rd Parliament, nor Bill C-98, which was introduced in the 42nd Parliament, were prioritized. Those two bills unfortunately died on the Order Paper. However, what is encouraging is that all parties seemed to agree. They supported the principle of these two bills, which is relatively the same as what we find today in Bill C‑20. All things come in threes, as they say. I hope the bill will pass this time. However, it is unfortunate that it was not made a priority earlier. It was more than 18 years ago that Justice O'Connor recommended the creation of an independent process to handle public complaints against the Canada Border Services Agency, or the CBSA. That decision was handed down in 2004, but it was not until 2022 that the government finally decided to act. As the Minister of Public Safety explained earlier, Bill C-20 seeks to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and the Canada Border Services Agency Act to change the public complaints process. This bill would establish the public complaints and review commission, which would replace the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. It would make it possible to investigate complaints concerning the conduct and level of service of RCMP and CBSA personnel and review specified activities of these two organizations. It is true that we currently have an independent oversight mechanism, but its mandate covers only matters affecting national security. It is therefore rather surprising that the CBSA is the only public safety agency in Canada that does not have a body that gives citizens recourse against an organization that can sometimes abuse its authority—
327 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:48:16 p.m.
  • Watch
Order. I am sorry to interrupt the hon. member, but a lot of people in the House are talking. Do they not realize that there is a debate happening right now? I would ask them, out of respect for the person who is speaking, to continue their conversations in the lobby. The hon. member for Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia.
65 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:48:41 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-20 
Madam Speaker, I appreciate that. I was saying that it is rather surprising that the CBSA is the only public safety agency in Canada that does not have a body that gives citizens recourse against an organization that can sometimes abuse its authority. That is unfortunate. My goal here is not to put CBSA officers on trial, but the fact is that, as in many organizations, sometimes abuse happens. The people who experience that abuse need a space to speak out against it and to have the results of the investigations reviewed if the results are unsatisfactory. At the same time, we all know that allowing an organization to investigate itself never produces great results. Therefore, it is very important to have an external oversight body. The fact that complaints are currently handled internally means that if a complainant is not satisfied with the outcome of an investigation, there is nowhere for them to turn to have those findings reviewed. This has been the case since the CBSA was created. Also, when complaints are dealt with internally, access to information requests must be made to obtain more details. We know what happens with access to information requests. As my colleague from Trois-Rivières said, the government is so transparent that we can see right through the pages it provides. He was referring to the 225 blank pages sent by Health Canada in response to an access to information request. I was talking about Justice O'Connor earlier, but the Privacy Commissioner of Canada also found major deficiencies in January 2020, particularly when it comes to searches of travellers' electronic devices. I am pleased that the government finally introduced Bill C‑20, and it can count on the Bloc Québécois's support for the bill to be studied quickly. I want to emphasize the importance of hearing from the different groups concerned, groups such as the Customs and Immigration Union, whose president has already expressed some reservations about the bill. Obviously we know that the CBSA is dealing with a major staff shortage. According to the president, this may contribute to causing delays and creating tension between officers and travellers. The government needs to ensure that customs officers have enough resources to do their job properly. There is no excuse for abuse, I just want that to be clear, but I also want to ensure that the border officers' union is involved in the process leading up to the passage of this bill.
419 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/3/22 3:51:24 p.m.
  • Watch
Maybe members did not understand me when I spoke in French, so I will speak in English. There is quite a buzz of discussion in the House right now. I would ask members to please take their discussions to the lobbies out of respect for the member of Parliament recognized to speak at the moment. The hon. member for Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia has the floor.
72 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border