SoVote

Context: House Hansard - 127 - Nov/15/22

Nov/15/22 3:37:10 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill S-5

Madam Speaker, I have to confess that in all the time since I was elected in 2014, I have never heard such a passionate plea for quorum. I am very glad the member opposite is so passionate about quorum. It is available every single day in the normal operating hours of the House. It is available every single operating day. The second point she made is a very important point, which is that every member in the House is elected to represent their constituents and to be able to voice their concerns, which is why I am also puzzled as to why she would be against extending the hours so she can do the thing she just said she wanted to do. Moreover, if we want to talk about our constituents, let us take a bill like Bill S-5. My hon. colleague spoke to it earlier. We spent six days on a bill that has unanimous support. Every day, we would ask how much more time the Conservatives would need, and they would say, “Oh, we do not know. We will see.” The next day, we would ask how much more time they would need. “We do not know. We will see.” The next day, we would ask how much time they would need. “We do not know. We will see.” Then we have to go to committee. Then we have third reading. We have report stage. This is done at every single stage, and this is for a bill they support. I would ask the hon. member opposite how she goes back and explains to her constituents that she is wasting days and days of House time.

285 words

All Topics

Ms. Lindsay Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe, NDP)

Nov/15/22 3:38:39 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I find it interesting when the Conservatives talk so much about efficiency and the resources of the House. Maybe we could talk about how that balance is created, in terms of what we are trying to do today, in terms of passing some legislation and having that meaningful discussion, not hurting democracy but expanding democracy, having the conversations that are needed and doing so in a balanced way to ensure that we can be as efficient as possible and financially efficient as well.

85 words

Hon. Mark Holland

Nov/15/22 3:39:14 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, the reality is that the resources of the House have to be brought to bear on that which is most important, which is adopting legislation to help Canadians and to make sure their needs are being met. The supremacy of the House must be recognized in that regard. It must be recognized that in terms of the legislation that is put in front of the House, Canadians have an expectation, and rightfully so, that the House will give it the appropriate attention and move it expeditiously, and that every member will be heard. The bill does exactly that. There are 31 committees. The idea that all 31 committees can sit on top of the House and block it from conducting its business is simply inappropriate. What is appropriate is that when we look at committees and their work, we make sure the resources of the House are managed in such a way that all the business of the House is conducted and done. There are 31 committees. That means we need to have conversations about the matters that are most important, if there is any influence because of the fact that we are waiting for more translators and additional resources, so that we never face these kinds of issues and so that we can ensure that the House, which has the principal responsibility of adopting legislation, is not interfered with in that process.

235 words

Mr. Frank Caputo (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, CPC)

Nov/15/22 3:40:31 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, it is always a pleasure to rise on behalf of the people of Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo. I am astounded at what I am hearing here. Committees are integral to what we do here. What I am hearing from the government House leader is that democracy is just too inconvenient right now for them.

57 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 3:41:02 p.m.
Watch

We cannot have cross debates. If the hon. member can get to his question, he will get his answer.

19 words

Mr. Mark Gerretsen

Nov/15/22 3:41:02 p.m.
Watch

Then you are not listening.

5 words

All Topics

Mr. Frank Caputo

Nov/15/22 3:41:02 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I am listening. It is true. That is exactly what they are saying—

16 words

All Topics

Mr. Frank Caputo

Nov/15/22 3:41:11 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, democracy, for the Liberal government, is proving just too inconvenient. That is what we are debating here today. Why can we not have committees? Why can we not do things during the normal allotted sitting hours in a constitutionally compliant manner? It is the Liberals who are the first to complain about the use of section 33 of the charter, yet here they are now, taking these actions. It is a shame that they are suppressing the very right to democracy that we were all elected to uphold.

90 words

All Topics

Hon. Mark Holland

Nov/15/22 3:41:52 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, the reason we cannot conduct our business in normal hours is that the party opposite refuses to allow that to occur. That is a tactic. It is called obstruction, and its objective is to block not only the government but also the House from conducting— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

53 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 3:42:06 p.m.
Watch

Again, I just want to remind members that they had an opportunity to ask a question, and they were not disrupted in doing so. Well, they were a little, because I had to bring order, but I want to remind members that if they want to listen to the question so we can get to the answer and then to more questions, that would be great.

66 words

Hon. Mark Holland

Nov/15/22 3:42:27 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, when one spends six days debating legislation one supports and has no amendments for, it is very clear one's objective is to slow down the government's agenda. It is not just the government's agenda. It is the agenda of the House and the responsibility of the House to adopt legislation, and the idea that it would not be responded to is foolhardy. If the idea that we have added time so there can be additional debate, so we can do less allocation of time and fewer motions that program, is somehow offensive, it goes against against the very point the Conservatives are making. We are trying to find a way to give them additional time to speak. Yes, absolutely, committees have incredible prominence and importance in our process. They feed our legislative process. However, when one uses committees to go trolling for partisan purposes and make newspaper headlines that have nothing to do with helping Canadians, and when one demonstrates that interest in trying to advance one's own partisan interest and troll for things one can put in newspapers, this has absolutely nothing to do with helping Canadians who need help right now. The idea that their partisan games should take supremacy over the needs and demands of this country is not responsible.

219 words

All Topics

Mr. Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, BQ)

Nov/15/22 3:43:44 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, in short, we are debating a closure motion about a gag order. That is how I see it. Most of the arguments that I am hearing are as follows: that democracy takes time, that there will be procedures in place and that we need to move forward quickly at all costs. However, I think that we need to take the time to do things right. That takes time. In times of crisis, like the one we just experienced with COVID-19, decisions were made in one day. That is normal in a time of crisis. However, we often noticed that there were a lot of negative effects because we did not follow the proper procedure. We must not skip over the committee work. We must not speed up debate at all costs. We are capable of functioning and doing things properly. Why do indirectly here what the government is not able to get done directly?

157 words

Hon. Mark Holland

Nov/15/22 3:44:35 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for his question. I would also like to thank the hon. whip of the Bloc Québécois, who is very responsible. At each stage, she clearly announces the number of speakers who will be rising and the amount of time the Bloc Québécois will need to pass a bill. I appreciate that. Unfortunately, that is not the case with the Conservative Party. The Conservative Party is always filibustering. This motion is so simple. We want to extend the hours of debate into the evening. This would give the Conservative Party, which is the only party in the House that has a problem with this, the opportunity to have more members speak. I find it odd that they would have a problem with that.

137 words

Mr. Gord Johns (Courtenay—Alberni, NDP)

Nov/15/22 3:45:41 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I am confused. I am hearing Conservatives talk about democracy and say they want to have an opportunity to speak. The whole premise of this is to ensure we sit later, so they all get a chance to get up and speak on a bill. We want to work later.

52 words

Mr. Gord Johns

Nov/15/22 3:46:35 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, it is true. That is exactly what we are doing here. We are trying to ensure that everybody gets an opportunity, by sitting to midnight. We want to work hard. We came here to work. I came 11 hours to get here from my door, from a riding that has 31 communities and is three time zones away. I am willing to sit here until midnight. I am willing to get the work done. Maybe the government House leader can speak about how ludicrous it is that we would not be sitting until midnight, when we need to get business done. I came far, from Vancouver Island, to get work done here.

114 words

Mrs. Kelly Block

Nov/15/22 3:46:35 p.m.
Watch

That's not true.

4 words

Hon. Mark Holland

Nov/15/22 3:46:37 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, I want to take the opportunity to thank all members for the sacrifices they make in their personal lives to represent their constituents. Yes, it does strike me as bizarre. In every meeting I have with the Conservatives I am told they need more speakers and do not have enough time for speakers, so we create a mechanism whereby they can have more speakers, and then it is undemocratic and they say it is terrible that we are giving them more time to have speakers. It is a terrible affront to democracy that they are being given what they asked for. It is very strange to me. What it cuts to, and what somebody who is reasonable might presume, is that the underlying issue is not how many speakers the Conservatives might have, but that we are taking away from them the ability to block every other party in the House from doing the business of this place. We are taking away their toy, which is obstruction. We are taking away their ability to not tell us how many speakers there are, and we are taking away their ability to block this House from doing its business.

199 words

Mr. Glen Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, CPC)

Nov/15/22 3:47:40 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, the House leader across the way mentioned just a couple of minutes ago the important business of the House, the important business that Canadians have asked us to be here for. This motion impacts one of those issues. I sit on the special joint committee for the invocation of the Emergencies Act. We lost multiple committee meetings in the last set before we broke for the summer because of exactly the same thing, because of night sittings. The government talks about the important work that has to be done. It seems like this is a planned process. It does not want to be accountable for the invocation of the Emergencies Act, which should not have happened in the first place. By holding up our committee work, the truth never comes out. That is what the Liberal government thinks. I would like the House leader to respond to the impact it has on important committee work that Canadians are depending on the House and its elected officials to look after.

171 words

All Topics

Hon. Mark Holland

Nov/15/22 3:48:45 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, let me say at the outset that at the Board of Internal Economy it is our objective to make sure the House has every resource it needs to be able to conduct the full totality of its business, and that it is unacceptable that any committee or any procedure of the House be interrupted. That is an adjustment we are continuing to need to work at, because the number of committees has expanded greatly. However, there is a fundamental difference, which I think the hon. colleague across the way would understand. Whether we are investigating the use of the Emergencies Act or any other matter, that matter can be continued the next day and the day after that, and members can have as any meetings as they want. I encourage the member to do exactly that. Members have the opportunity to be able to conduct that business. If I could, because I think it is an important point, the difference is that when we are dealing with dental care, there are people waiting for that benefit. When we are dealing with housing, there are people waiting for that benefit. There are people who, if we delay those supports and services, are suffering. With respect to an inquiry, that can wait—

213 words

All Topics

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)

Nov/15/22 3:49:42 p.m.
Watch

We have time for a brief question. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.

16 words

Secretary