SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 136

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 28, 2022 11:00AM
  • Nov/28/22 4:03:37 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, my colleague talked about the tribunal aspect. It is very important that, in this bill, when it comes to privacy protection, besides the Privacy Commissioner, we would have another element of a tribunal. Most importantly, out of that process, there would still be the Federal Court. When it comes to citizens having their data breached, and the whole premise of this bill is to protect that of citizens, children and adults alike, there is still going be a tribunal added. Is there any other jurisdiction that is using a tribunal? If not, why does the member think it is included in this bill?
105 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 4:35:02 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, the issue of the tribunal is an interesting one. Does the member know what the cost of the tribunal will be? We are taking away a potential resource from the Privacy Commissioner and/or the court system, and we will have to create an entirely new organization. I am curious to know what the cost of the tribunal will be.
62 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 6:23:52 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Mr. Speaker, the member made reference to some things that were mentioned previously. I am forming the opinion that the Conservative Party does not support having a tribunal. I guess I am looking for clarification on that point. Is it the Conservative Party's approach to say that, once the commission has made a decision, a tribunal would not be warranted and that the only recourse would be to take it to a federal court? What would it replace the tribunal with, or would it replace it with anything?
89 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border