SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 136

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 28, 2022 11:00AM
  • Nov/28/22 12:20:31 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, the member touched a little on children's personal rights and protection. I wonder if he could comment on seniors and what kind of an impact it would have on them if they were exposed to this legislation. How could the legislation in fact harm seniors, especially if it was made more bureaucratic?
55 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 1:23:14 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, one of the concerns I have with the bill is again with respect to companies having too many rights and too much power within this. One of them is around the disposal of information. Could the member talk about his party's concern with that as well, when companies say that they are disposing of it and yet that information is truly not disposable?
66 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 2:44:45 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, first I want to underline that we stand with women who are marching for their rights in Iran. We stand with those who have been protesting here in Canada. We continue to engage with members of the community here, because we know this is a critical time to stand up for human rights. As I have said on numerous occasions, that is why we have gone further than just looking at the IRGC as a problematic contributor to the transgression of human rights. We have targeted the entirety of the Iranian regime, including members of the IRGC, which is a very effective tool we can use to ensure that Canada will never be used as a safe haven for the transgression of human rights.
126 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 4:33:14 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, I would note that from point 17 to point 50 there is a whole raft of exemptions for this bill. It is interesting to me that we are trying to build something that is predictable for the business community and protects the interests of the individual. Does the member not think that several pages of exemptions does neither? It does not give definition to business and also does not protect the rights of individuals.
76 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 4:56:43 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, I note that the last time we had any real changes to the privacy legislation of this magnitude was a couple of decades ago. We did not even have iPhones 20 years ago, so I would ultimately argue that there is a need for change. Tim Hortons aside, I believe the legislation we are talking about provides a good balance between consumer rights, the issue of privacy and the whole digital market out there. No doubt, it would be nice to see the legislation go before committee and, ideally, for that to take place sometime before the end of the year. Given the urgency of the issue itself and the fact that we have not seen anything for 20 years, would the member agree that it would be nice to see the legislation pass before the end of this year?
142 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 5:37:37 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague spoke about rights, and I agree with her that privacy rights are an important part of the digital age. Like other rights, we must be clear where we stand on them. I am wondering if the member agrees with me in questioning whether making it easier for the Facebooks and the Googles of the world to use Canadians' personal information in ways that have nothing to do with their services in the guise of helping small business is the right place to stand. That is certainly one of concerns I have.
96 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border