SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 137

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 29, 2022 10:00AM
  • Nov/29/22 12:53:49 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-29 
Madam Speaker, I listened carefully to the speech by my colleague from Outremont. As we know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I would therefore like to understand what my colleague and her government truly think about the Indian Act. How can her government claim to be relying on Bill C‑29 to embark on a true reconciliation process without talking about the possibility of replacing or eliminating the Indian Act, which the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations has described as unacceptable? I would like to hear my colleague's comments on that.
98 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Madam Speaker, I was in the House when you ruled that it was inappropriate to discuss Bill C‑5 in the context of this debate. With all due respect to my colleague and his political party, I note that he is referring to a different piece of legislation. I, for one, would need more than 10 seconds to comment on the Indian Act. I am very aware of the importance of the issue raised by my colleague and I would be pleased to continue the discussion with him.
90 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/29/22 5:02:03 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-29 
Mr. Speaker, let me digress for a moment to talk about language learning. A few years ago, in 2018, in an effort to reconnect with my roots, I was able to take classes in the Wendat language from an office in Montreal, even though Wendake is in the Quebec City area. I salute the efforts that the Wendake officials made at that time to spread their language to their diaspora. I say bravo to them. Now, I am entirely in favour, and we are all in favour, of this national council for reconciliation, despite the reservations some may have about the word “reconciliation”, as my colleague said. That being said, it is all well and good to begin speeches with references to unceded territory and all that, but as long as the Indian Act, a title that is racist in itself, remains in place, what is the point?
150 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/29/22 5:02:59 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-29 
Mr. Speaker, if I think of the indigenous people I represent, when we talk about systemic racism, the Indian Act is perhaps the most obvious example, and certainly for all of us, it is shameful that it still exists. Obviously, it is bad to be out of step with the times, and this is something that needs to change. I spoke of symbolism. We are talking about concrete actions, but we will have to go further and tackle the relics of colonialism, although the word “relics” is too weak.
91 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/29/22 5:04:52 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-29 
Mr. Speaker, if I were to try to sum up my thoughts on the importance of the council with respect to the calls to action and how effective the council itself will be, I would say that it is going to be up to the indigenous people themselves. One of the things I forgot to mention in my speech is that one of the government's responsibilities will be to provide all the information that indigenous people feel is necessary to do this work. That is important, but the government will not be able to free itself of all its responsibilities, either. It must ensure that it does not prevent the council from functioning properly. On the one hand, the council must be independent, but at the same time, the government is responsible for providing everything that is needed for concrete action to be taken until the Indian Act and all colonial practices are completely abandoned.
156 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border