44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 2, 2023 10:00AM
- Feb/2/23 2:36:42 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, where does Canada stand after eight years of Liberal governance? Inflation is at a 40-year high. Rent has doubled. Mortgages have doubled. Back home in Quebec City, eight years ago, people I know were helping those who needed food banks. Now, they are the ones using food banks themselves. That is the everyday reality of Canadians after eight years of Liberal governance.
When will the Liberals start managing the public purse properly?
75 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:37:16 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we believe that we need to invest in Canadians to help them get through tough times, as we did during the pandemic and as we are doing right now with the increase in inflation.
That is why we are helping students by eliminating interest on student loans. That is why we introduced the new Canada workers benefit and created the Canada dental benefit for children under 12. We think that, when we invest in Canadians, it benefits everyone.
That is how Canada can be stronger.
87 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:37:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is the problem. After eight years, Canada is not stronger. Canada is weaker, despite the fact that this government has added $500 billion in debt. The debt has doubled. There have been no spending controls at all for the past eight years. Taxes have gone up. Everything costs more. That is the reality in Canada. That is what Canadians are facing every day.
When will this government finally assume its responsibilities and manage public finances properly?
80 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:38:26 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives are saying that we helped Canadians too much.
I would like to know when and where they would have made cuts. Was it when we were helping with the wage subsidy that they would have cut? Was it when we were helping seniors that they would have cut? Was it when we were helping families that they would have cut? Was it when we were helping people who had lost their jobs that they would have cut?
I would really like to know at what point exactly would they have turned their backs on Canadians.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:38:56 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Ottawa wants to receive at least 500,000 immigrants a year until we have a population of 100 million. These targets are inspired by the Century Initiative, which originated with McKinsey and its former director, Dominic Barton.
Yesterday, in committee, I asked Mr. Barton if he had analyzed the impact of this increase in immigration on the future of French. He replied, and I will paraphrase, that the focus was just on the economics, not the social context.
Did the government paste and copy a McKinsey immigration policy that completely ignores the future of French in Canada and Quebec?
103 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:39:44 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, today, this is the first time that I will answer a question concerning francophone immigration and its importance for Quebec and the rest of Canada. I would like to point out to the House, because I do not know if I will have another opportunity, that this is the first time ever that we have met the target of 4.4% of francophone immigrants outside Quebec in Canada.
This is a success story for our government.
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:40:25 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Dominic Barton himself confirmed yesterday that the Century Initiative does not take into account the ability to integrate immigrants in French in Quebec and francophone Canada. He said the only objective was productivity.
If McKinsey did not take into account the repercussions of increased immigration on the French language, did the government do so before applying these recommendations?
Will the minister commit to sharing all the studies he used to determine that we could welcome at least 500,000 immigrants every year without any repercussions on the French language and francization in Quebec and Canada?
97 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:41:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, francophone immigration plays a key role in promoting the French language across Canada and Quebec. I would remind my colleagues that Quebec determines its selection criteria for the majority of immigrants in Quebec, including language skills.
We will always respect the jurisdictions of Quebec and we will continue to work with them.
54 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:41:41 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Dominic Barton himself admitted that McKinsey did not consider the impact on French before recommending unprecedented increases to immigration. Unless and until we see the studies the Bloc Québécois has been calling for, we have to assume that the federal government did not consider the impact on French either before implementing McKinsey's recommendations. Obviously, that raises other questions.
Can this government prove that it did consider the impact on housing needs, health care and immigration, or did it just blindly put its faith in a subcontractor like McKinsey?
95 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:42:20 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the member opposite is well aware that the Canada-Quebec accord gives the province the exclusive authority to select the majority of its immigrants.
As I said, we have always respected and will always respect Quebec's jurisdiction over immigration. I know that our government is working very closely with Quebec to improve that framework. Let me reiterate that we met our 4.4% francophone immigration target outside Quebec.
71 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:43:03 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, while Canadians have been suffering for eight years under the government, well-connected insiders have never had it so good. Dominic Barton confirmed yesterday that McKinsey's Canadian lead, Andrew Pickersgill, was coordinating support from McKinsey to the Prime Minister's growth council. In other words, his analysts were telling the government what it needed while they were selling McKinsey as a solution at the same time. If that is not a conflict of interest, I do not know what is.
Will the government end the obvious conflict of interest and finally tell the House how much money was spent on McKinsey?
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:43:39 p.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, the minister responsible has already answered that question, but let us set the record straight in terms of who is actually standing on the side of Canadians. That is our government. What have the Conservatives done? They voted not once, not twice, but three times against tax cuts for Canadians. That side of the aisle voted against eliminating interest on apprentice and student loans. They voted against a federal minimum wage, and they voted against expanding the Canada workers benefit.
Who stands on the side of Canadians? We do. Canadians know one thing. When the chips are down, Canadians cannot count on Conservatives.
105 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:44:15 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we do know the government stands on the side of those Canadians who work for McKinsey. However, on this side of the House we speak for the vast majority of Canadians who are concerned about $100 million in contracts and the public service not knowing what work was done.
After eight years, more Canadians than ever are suffering because of the opioid crisis, but the government continues to defend its friends. McKinsey's managing director, Dominic Barton, claimed to have no knowledge of the relationship with Purdue Pharma.
Did the Prime Minister or government ministers have any conversations with McKinsey staff about the opioid crisis? Yes or no.
110 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:45:00 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, after eight years, what Canadians absolutely know is that the Conservative plan, when it comes to opioids, is dangerous, it is reckless and it would put people in harm's way. What Canadians do know is that when it comes to standing with them, we have stood with them, whether it was when we came into office and put in important measures to lift people out of poverty or whether it was during the pandemic when we were there in their darkest hour. Now, when it comes to inflation, we put forward targeted measures that are helping Canadians every day. They know we stand with them.
108 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:45:34 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, every government uses private sector legal or technical services from time to time. What we have here is a Liberal government that has completely lost control of government over the last eight years. The Prime Minister has handed his governance responsibilities over to multinational corporations like McKinsey. Instead of wasting billions of dollars on these companies, the Prime Minister could have invested here with our best talent.
Why did the Prime Minister throw the federal public service under the bus?
82 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:46:05 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we have an outstanding public service, and we trust the public sector employees we work with every day.
We are investing in Canadians to ensure that our economy continues to grow and that programs are properly designed to help Canadians who need them most. All of these programs are administered by our wonderful public sector workers.
58 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:46:36 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Canadians are making tough choices about what they can and cannot afford because grocery prices are so unbelievably high. Today, Loblaws decided to stop the price freeze they put in place under considerable public pressure. This proves that grocery CEOs can control what people pay. The government has to take a stand against the corporate greed that is hurting Canadian families. Enough is enough.
When are the Liberals going to put in place a windfall profits tax against corporate greed and put that money back into the pockets of Canadian families, who need it?
96 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:47:15 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to say to all Canadians that we agree with the member. Enough is enough. That is why we took action. That is why, way back, I wrote to the Competition Bureau to ask them to investigate to make sure there were not any undue practices.
I also spoke to the CEOs to tell them to do what is right to help Canadians at their time of need. We will continue to push them to lower prices for Canadians.
83 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:47:46 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, seniors across the country are struggling with the rising cost of living. There is a bar of dignity that we should all expect in Canada, and far too many of our parents and grandparents are living below it.
Yesterday, the government denied my motion to get more financial help to all seniors, regardless of age. All seniors have to pay for food, rent and medication. They deserve dignity. Why does the Minister of Seniors not agree?
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/2/23 2:48:20 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the NDP knows that older seniors are more likely to outlive their savings. They are more likely to be unable to work, be widowed and have increased health care needs. This increase helps seniors over 75, of which 50% have a severe disability, 59% are women and 40% are widows. Last fall, we doubled the GST tax credit for seniors 65 and over, which will put an extra $225 back in their pockets.
We will always provide support for seniors, and we will continue to deliver for them.
90 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
