44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 30, 2023 10:00AM
- Mar/30/23 2:35:16 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, something is not sinking in. The climate rebate will put more money in people's pockets. The member should look at page 5 of the original PBO report that says eight out of 10 families will be better off.
What will not make families better off is investing in cryptocurrency. That is reckless economic advice by the Leader of the Opposition. Will he stand in his place and apologize to Canadians for his reckless environmental advice?
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:35:52 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, for the Emergencies Act commission, the government named a Liberal staffer as the independent commissioner. For the foreign interference rapporteur, it named a member of the Trudeau Foundation and the Prime Minister's ski buddy. Now it needed someone to be an ethics commissioner, so it named a Liberal minister's sister-in-law to that position of independent Ethics Commissioner. This is the same minister who has already been found guilty of violating the law.
When is the Liberal government going to run out of family and friends to name as independent officers?
96 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:36:32 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the ski buddy that the hon. member refers to is David Johnston, an eminent Canadian whom Stephen Harper actually chose to be governor general of this country. He stood in his place and commended David Johnston as being a good and appropriate choice for governor general. To suggest that David Johnston does not have the best interests of Canada at heart as he looks at the issue of foreign interference is ridiculous.
With respect to the position that he has just referred to, the interim Ethics Commissioner, again this is somebody who has been in that office for 10 years, who came in when Stephen Harper was in office and is second in command in that office.
119 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:37:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, one can almost imagine the conversation between the Liberal intergovernmental affairs minister, who was found guilty of breaking the ethics law, and the Prime Minister, who has twice been found guilty of breaking the ethics law. One can imagine them saying, “How are we going to quit getting found guilty? I know, we'll appoint my sister-in-law as the Ethics Commissioner.” What a plan. It is foolproof.
The problem is that pretty soon they are going to run out of family and friends. After they do, how are they going to avoid their next conviction for breaking the law?
105 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:37:52 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there is a place where comedy routines can be tried out; I would suggest that it is not on the floor of the House of Commons.
What I will say about the conversations that have taken place in the Ethics Commissioner's office is that, for 10 years, the individual in question has absolutely made hard decisions on the government, as well as other parties, and she has comported herself with total professionalism. She was appointed as number two in charge in the Ethics Commissioner's office during Stephen Harper's time in office.
What is not professional is to take somebody who has worked in the public service for 10 years making hard decisions, including hard decisions that affected the government, and treat them in that way.
130 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:38:34 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Liberal Prime Minister and his gang of serial lawbreakers were told by the outgoing Ethics Commissioner to take remedial ethics training. Instead, at Sunday brunch, the Liberal cabinet minister turned to his sister-in-law and said, “How about we make you the new Ethics Commissioner?”
When are the Liberals going to take their responsibilities seriously and appoint someone who is independent and can restore accountability to this place for all Canadians?
77 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:39:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Ethics Commissioner's role in our democracy is extremely important. Over the last 10 years in which the person they are referring to has been in the office, they have taken a lot of difficult positions against the government, and frankly, against that party. The person was appointed at the time of Stephen Harper, in the number two position. These decisions have been well-received in the sense that the Ethics Commissioner's job is to hold us to the highest possible standard. The idea that a public servant cannot do their job or set aside differences, when they have a screen in place, is not realistic.
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:39:45 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the arrogance of the Liberal government is stranger than fiction. Even the writers for the Simpsons could not have dreamed up such satire. The Prime Minister, who has twice been found guilty of ethics violations, has appointed as interim ethics commissioner, the sister-in-law of his best friend, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, himself found guilty of ethics violations for awarding a contract to his cousin.
Is the brother-in-law of the interim ethics commissioner, the minister, going to take advantage of family get-togethers over Easter to ask her if it is ethical for his best friend, the Prime Minister, to appoint his sister-in-law to rule on his ethics?
116 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:40:19 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the person in question was part of the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner when the decisions were made on the matter involving the Prime Minister and on other issues. Clearly, this person is capable of acting independently. She was appointed to the office during Prime Minister Harper's government and has been at that office for 10 years.
64 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:40:50 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we better not be sliding into a recession given that the Liberals have once again dropped the promised EI reform from the budget. In the midst of all this economic uncertainty, they just told 60% of workers that if something bad happens to them, tough luck, because they will not be able to rely on EI or the federal government.
Every economist is wary of the year ahead, so how can the Liberals abandon the only safety net that workers have if they lose their job?
89 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:41:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we know Canada's EI system is complex, and that is why we are focused on improving it. In the past two years, the minister led more than 35 virtual, national and regional round tables with workers, employers and academics. EI reform is a priority. We are on it, and we will get it done.
At the same time, we are making historic investments in skills training and in support like child care to help more Canadians re-enter the workforce, and it is working. Over 830,000 more Canadians are working than before the pandemic. On this side, we will always, always have workers' backs.
108 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:42:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals promised to overhaul EI in 2015, then in 2019, then in 2021, then last summer at the very latest, then before Christmas, guaranteed. They always push it further down the line, always later. Even now, the Liberals are completely abandoning that reform in the budget.
If the Liberals cannot keep their promise to working people today, when economists are worried there is going to be a recession, when are they going to do it?
79 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:42:54 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for her question because it is a very important question.
We have always been there for workers across Canada. We have promised EI reform and we will deliver.
In this budget, we have demonstrated once again that we are there for Canadian workers across the country and we will continue to be.
62 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:43:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there is absolutely nothing. Here is what seniors will find in the budget to help them deal with the cost of living: absolutely nothing.
We still have two classes of seniors. Pensions for those aged 74 and under have not increased. Seniors receiving the guaranteed income supplement who want to continue working are still heavily penalized. Others who also want to help mitigate the labour shortage have no incentive to do so.
In a 300-page budget, why did the Liberals not spare a single thought for people aged 65 and over?
94 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:43:55 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, budget 2023 continues to grow our government's plan to support seniors, but do not take my word for it. FADOQ, the largest senior-serving organization in Quebec, said it “welcomes the financial support offered to seniors in the federal budget, notably with the one-time grocery rebate and the expansion of the Canadian Dental Care Plan.” Our new dental care plan will help nine million Canadians, including seniors, get the dental care they need, and our grocery rebate will put hundreds of dollars back in their pockets.
I hope the member opposite will vote for this budget so she can continue to support seniors in her riding, in Quebec and all across Canada.
118 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:44:39 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, what a surprise. The Liberal carbon tax is not revenue-neutral and actually costs Canadians thousands of dollars a year. It is only going to get worse when the Liberal-NDP costly coalition increases the carbon tax on Saturday. We know when they triple the carbon tax, it will cost Canadian farmers $150,000 a year, but every single Canadian will pay the price when they buy bread, pasta, fruit, vegetables and milk. Higher carbon taxes mean higher inflation and higher food prices.
How high does the price of bread need to be before the Prime Minister realizes Canadians cannot afford it anymore and axes the carbon tax?
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:45:19 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there is a lot of good news in budget 2023 for our farmers, starting with the vaccine bank for foot and mouth disease. This was a request made by the various meat sectors in Canada and it was very important to them.
In addition, the advance payments program has been increased, which means we can offer interest-free loans up to $350,000. This is very important to our producers.
72 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
Mr. Speaker, yesterday, despite the Liberal Party, this House passed Bill C-234, which exempts farm fuels, grain drying and farm heating from the carbon tax. However, the carbon tax does not just apply to the farm. It applies to the entire food value chain, from the mining and manufacture of fertilizers to the delivery of farm inputs to the delivery of farm production to the packaging of farm inputs, farm production and groceries, at every step of the way. The result is that now a family of four is going to pay $1,100 more for their groceries in 2023.
When is the costly coalition going to get the facts and stop the tax?
115 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:46:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, once again, our government is always there to support our agricultural producers in different ways.
We signed the sustainable Canadian agricultural partnership, which will give $3.5 billion to the agricultural sector.
When the Conservatives were in power, they cut funding for science and risk management programs. We are there to help producers in several ways.
59 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/30/23 2:47:04 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the carbon tax will increase on April 1. Unfortunately that is not an April Fool's joke.
The carbon tax increases the cost of food and the cost of fuel for truckers. It also directly impacts our farmers and our producers.
According to Canada's Food Price Report 2023, if the tax triples, a 5,000-acre farm will pay more than $150,000 in taxes.
The Liberals have until tomorrow night at midnight. Will they stop it? Will they cancel it?
85 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
