44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 31, 2023 10:00AM
- Mar/31/23 11:37:30 a.m.
- Watch
The hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change.
12 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:37:34 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, it is really puzzling. Every single person on that side of the aisle campaigned in 2021 on putting a price on pollution. Stephen Harper was in favour of a carbon tax before he was against it. The member for Wellington—Halton Hills made it the centrepiece of his leadership campaign in 2017. The MP for Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge, as a member of the B.C. government, actually introduced the first carbon price in North America.
The Conservatives need to stop flip-flopping, get serious about climate change and present their own plan.
97 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:38:12 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, tonight, 12:01 a.m. will spell very bad news for Canadians from coast to coast to coast. The Liberal carbon tax is going up.
This is going to have a direct impact on every family in Canada, as the Parliamentary Budget Officer demonstrated yesterday, with numbers to prove it. Transportation, food, heating—they will all cost more.
Why is the government once again punishing Canadian workers and families?
74 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:38:41 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, as my hon. colleague knows very well, the price on pollution does not apply in Quebec. Quebec is a leader in managing the clean economy.
Every time we have cut taxes for workers, the Conservatives have voted against it, whether it was a tax rebate for workers or a tax cut for Canadians.
With this budget, we already know that they are going to vote against workers. They are the ones voting against it, and we are the ones supporting Canadians.
85 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:39:20 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, that clearly shows that this government is completely out of touch with reality.
In a March 15 interview with the Journal de Québec, Groupe Robert, a well-established Quebec transport company, stated that this will have a direct impact on everything that comes from British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
Not only do the Liberals not know what they are talking about, but everything will cost more for all Canadians, including Quebeckers.
77 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:39:55 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, what we must be clear about is that climate change has a cost for Canadians.
We all remember the wildfires in Fort McMurray. We all remember the floods in Calgary. We all remember the flooding that happened across the country.
We must fight climate change. Economists have said that the best mechanism in our system is a price on pollution to combat climate change. That is what we are implementing. We will fight climate change.
77 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:40:36 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, if there is one role that must be free from any and all appearance of conflict of interest, it is the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
The Liberals are proving their total lack of judgment once again by appointing a minister's sister-in-law as interim commissioner. We are not questioning her competence or integrity. Cabinet is the one at fault for choosing to appoint a family member of one of their own.
The appearance of conflict of interest is obvious. Even though they do not seem to know what a conflict of interest is, we are asking the Liberals to reconsider this appointment.
Will they reconsider this appointment?
114 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:41:16 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I would emphasize that the interim Ethics Commissioner is a career public servant who has served in a senior role in the Ethics Commissioner's office for more than 10 years. That is beginning when the Harper government was actually in office.
44 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:41:36 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, this is just another in a long list of Liberal ethical lapses.
They appointed one of the Prime Minister's neighbours from the cottage as special rapporteur on Chinese interference. They appointed a Liberal staffer to head the commission on Ottawa's protest convoy. Today, they appointed a minister's sister-in-law as Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
No one is questioning her qualifications. That said, there are 39 million Canadians out there, so why does every Liberal appointment always go to someone with Liberal Party connections?
93 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:42:09 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, once again, I would like to put an emphasis on the importance of recognizing the fine work that our civil servants do. I would just say that the interim Ethics Commissioner who is being referenced is a career public servant. She has served in a senior role in the Ethics Commissioner's office for more than 10 years, beginning when the Harper government was in office. We owe a great deal to our professional civil servants.
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:42:49 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, Canadians pay the highest cellphone prices in the world. In fact, Rogers telecommunications is the most expensive telecommunications carrier in the world. How expensive is it? It is three times as expensive as Australia and twice as expensive as the U.S. and Europe. The Rogers-Shaw deal will only make the priciest and the biggest company only bigger. We need more competition in Canada, which means not just a fourth carrier, but 40 carriers to supply more choice to Canadians, and lower prices. When will the minister get serious about competition instead of pandering to just one monopoly?
101 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:43:20 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I am very pleased with the question from my colleague. Perhaps he did not fully listen to the press conference this morning. If he looks at the contract the prices that we see in Quebec, which are on average 20% lower than in the rest of Canada, now will have to be offered in Ontario, Manitoba, British Columbia and Alberta. In addition to that, we got commitments to have a headquarters in Calgary, Alberta and 3,000 new jobs in western Canada. Canadians know that we have their backs and western Canadians understand that.
96 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:44:02 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, in fact, Videotron's prices are higher than Freedom Mobile's prices, so if Liberals really believed in competition they would have let a competitive bidding process happen for Freedom. The Liberals are in the back pocket of Rogers. They allowed Rogers to ignore three higher bidders from Freedom. These Liberals and the PMO were lobbied more than 60 times by Videotron and Rogers during the sales process, but did not meet once with any other bidder. Why did Rogers get privileged access to the Liberals that other bidders did not?
93 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:44:35 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I have enormous respect for my colleague and my critic. One thing he would know is that, as the regulator, they do not meet with the parties. That is a basic principle in due process. What Canadians, particularly western Canadians, understood this morning is that we have their backs because what they want is lower prices. The way to do that is to have competition and the way to do that is for a fourth national player. Members on the other side who may not have had a chance can read the contract with Canadians. That is the way that we bring lower prices in Canada.
108 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:45:12 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, the minister only needs to check the lobbyist registry to see more than 65 meetings with his department and the PMO. In December, this Liberal minister said he would not rule on the sale until the legal challenges were over. There is a legal challenge before the CRTC currently on this deal where Rogers is providing preferential rates to Videotron for access to its network that no other cellphone provider can get. Why has this minister flip-flopped on his commitment to wait for the legal challenges to be over? Is it because Rogers set today as the deadline?
101 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:45:51 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I am so happy that my colleagues ask questions. I look forward to more questions because one thing that people at home understand is that we are fighting every step of the way to bring prices lower in Canada. What we have achieved today is a new chapter in telecom in Canada. For the first time in Canada's history, more than 150 years, we have binding legal commitments by telecom in a contract with Canada to bring prices lower in Canada. It is this government that did that. Canadians know we have their backs. We will fight for them every step of the way.
107 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:46:30 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, today the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry announced the merger of Rogers and Shaw, communications companies, which forces Vidéotron, another company involved in the transaction, to lower its prices in Quebec. However, the other companies involved in this transaction were not forced to lower their wireless prices.
Why?
54 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:46:51 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question. It is fairly straightforward. We are the regulator and there are two parties involved, which is why we were able to get commitments from both Vidéotron and Rogers.
There is one thing Canadians understand, and it is very simple. If Vidéotron adds pricing pressure in western Canadian markets, it will cause the other telecoms to lower their prices as well. Boosting competition brings prices down. That is exactly what we did today for Canadians.
88 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:47:34 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I have been speaking with energy workers, miners, auto workers and innovators who are more than ready to make Canada a world leader in clean energy, but to get cheap and renewable energy to market requires massive investments in the national energy grid.
Now, New Democrats worked with this government and we have pushed this government to get serious about sustainable jobs that are tied to obligations for good union wages and apprenticeships. What kind of funding will the government put in place to build the electricity grid that Canadians need for a sustainable 21st century?
98 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Mar/31/23 11:48:11 a.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I am very happy that the member opposite asked that question, because this budget that we tabled this week shows exactly our commitment to a strong, sustainable electrical grid. We know that union workers and good-paying jobs are part of that work that we need to get done.
We are supporting strong, sustainable jobs right across this country, and we know that our union workers are the backbone of the work we need to do.
78 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
