44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 17, 2023 11:00AM
- Apr/17/23 2:51:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, to my great regret, I am afraid it is my colleague who is misleading this chamber and Canadians. It is the Prime Minister and the government that have continually said that we take foreign interference seriously. This is why we have put in place the people, the resources, the authorities, and in addition to that, the transparency to shine a light on the way in which we are protecting our institutions, our economies, and most importantly, Canadians.
I encourage my colleague to support the budget, which will also include more resources for the RCMP and other law enforcement agencies to protect Canadians from foreign interference. I look forward to that day when he supports the budget on this side of the House.
124 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:51:56 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Trudeau Foundation accepted a gift of $200,000 from an agent for Beijing's dictatorship, and senior PMO officials were made aware of the gift and where it came from. The Prime Minister's chief of staff told committee that the Prime Minister is briefed on everything and nothing is withheld from him.
On what date did the Prime Minister become aware that the Trudeau Foundation accepted a $200,000 gift from the Communist dictatorship in Beijing?
80 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:52:25 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have already made it clear in this House that the Prime Minister, over the last 10 years, has not had any involvement with that foundation.
The member opposite is asserting, and let us go with the heart of what he is asserting, that this government would welcome the interference of a foreign country. That is absolutely absurd. The fact that it would be clapped for is disgusting. Every single member of this House is dedicated to ensuring Canadian democracy. The member opposite, myself and every member has firmed themselves to protect and defend Canadian democracy, and every member of this House will continue to do so.
109 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:53:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, let us just be clear. The Trudeau Foundation is government-funded, and Liberal governments have in the past, and the Liberal government still has the ability to, appointed members to the foundation. It must be a coincidence that after Beijing's gift to the Trudeau Foundation, the Prime Minister met with the front men who signed the cheque on behalf of the Communist dictatorship and gave them a meeting where they had direct access to influence the Prime Minister.
Why are shady deals and influence opportunities for dictators the priority for the Liberal Prime Minister?
97 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:53:52 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, what is clear is that the priority of the party opposite is to attack not-for-profits, independent organizations, the CBC, the media—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
31 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:54:03 p.m.
- Watch
I am just waiting for everyone to calm down. Order.
The hon. government House leader has another 25 seconds.
19 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:54:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, on the floor of the House of Commons, members are protected by privilege. They have the opportunity to say anything they wish. However, when they are swinging their bats aimlessly for partisan advantage, they are attacking not-for-profit or non-partisan foundations, they are attacking organizations like the CBC and they are attacking free and independent media. They seem to have no care whatsoever over what or who they attack for their partisan ends. It is not becoming of this place.
84 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:55:07 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, here are the facts.
The Communist regime in Beijing feels that it can influence the Prime Minister by using its money and front men. Clearly, it is a master at it. Two directors at the Trudeau Foundation are appointed by a minister in the Prime Minister's cabinet. The Prime Minister himself is still a member of the foundation, according to its most recent annual report. By accepting a contribution from a front man, the foundation directly contravened the Income Tax Regulations.
Will the Minister of National Revenue open an investigation into the use of front men at the Trudeau Foundation?
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:55:45 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the only interest the other side has is a partisan interest. It is also clear that the goal is to keep playing politics, which certainly does nothing to help our economy or our democracy.
Obviously, each and every one of us here, including myself and those on the other side, are loyal to Canada. Obviously, this is our primary responsibility as members of Parliament. That is why I am here and that is why the members opposite are here.
81 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:56:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the ice storm ruined Easter for many Quebeckers, either because they had no power or they were working around the clock to restore it. The Bloc Québécois stands in solidarity with all those who have suffered loss and damage.
The Prime Minister has offered federal assistance and we thank him for that. However, we must point out that Ottawa made the same commitments during the ice storm 25 years ago, but the money was never paid out. Ottawa still owes us $484 million.
Will the Prime Minister start by paying what Ottawa already owes us?
102 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:57:12 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the disaster financial assistance arrangement, which is organized and managed by the federal government, works very closely with all of the provinces. We worked with the Province of Quebec, in particular, on a number of the disasters that have impacted that community. We have always been there for it. When those receipts are submitted to the government for reimbursement, we have been able to act expeditiously in every case.
71 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:57:39 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Quebec and its towns are still adding up the cost and compiling a list of the damage caused by the ice storm. There is no need to wait, because Ottawa already owes $484 million from the last crisis.
At the time, Ottawa refused to compensate Hydro‑Québec, claiming that Crown corporations were not eligible for disaster relief. That has become an embarrassing excuse, since the federal government invested billions of dollars in Muskrat Falls in Newfoundland and Labrador. Quebec is only asking for its fair share to repair the damage from the ice storm.
When will the federal government pay the $484 million it owes us?
113 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:58:22 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we obviously share the sentiments of our colleague when it comes to the gratitude we have for the men and women who worked so hard in Quebec and in other provinces to restore power after the ice storm. We are obviously concerned about those who have suffered losses. There is an agreement between Canada and all the provinces to help recoup money and reimburse costs eligible under the agreements that have been in place for decades.
We are working with the Government of Quebec. We understand the urgent need to take action. That is precisely what we will do in partnership with the Government of Quebec.
108 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:59:02 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, based on Bill C-11 and Bill C-18, we know the government is abundantly committed to censoring what people can see, post or hear online. However, what we just learned is that the Prime Minister actually got a head start. According to government documents that were tabled in the House of Commons, the Liberals actually pressured social media companies a total of 214 times over the period of 24 months. Talk about heavy-handed. Why is the government so committed to censoring speech?
86 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 2:59:39 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we cannot spell conspiracy without “CPC”. It is another day, another conspiracy theory.
Once again, the Conservatives choose to abandon our creators. They stand up for big tech companies and turn their backs on our culture, but we choose to stand up for it. We believe foreign tech giants should do more for our creators. Canadians have the best stories to tell, and this is supporting hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs. We will always stand up for creators and artists on this side of the House.
92 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 3:00:12 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, what we know for certain is that the government will do all it can to dodge or deflect questions that it does not want to answer. There is nothing conspiratorial about a document that was tabled right here in the House of Commons that shows the government pressured social media platforms 214 times within 24 months to remove content the government simply found embarrassing or did not want the public to be aware of.
I will ask again: Why is the government so hell-bent on censoring freedom of speech in the country of Canada?
97 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 3:00:51 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the suggestion that the hon. member is making is absolutely preposterous. The Conservatives want to protect the status quo. They do not think foreign tech giants should stand up for our culture and pay into Canadian culture, but we disagree. We believe tech giants should do more for artists, more for creators, more for our local media and more to protect our children online. We are open to criticism and we are open to changes, but we are not open to doing nothing, which is what the Conservative Party of Canada suggests.
94 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 3:01:22 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as a result of a written question tabled by the member for Niagara West, we learned from documents tabled here in the House that, over the course of two years, the government asked web giants on 214 occasions to take down content posted by Canadians. That is direct action by the government to censor Canadians.
My question for the government is very simple: Why were Canadians censored 214 times online?
72 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 3:01:56 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, it is completely irresponsible to suggest that the government censors Canadians' questions and comments. What is true is that we will be there to defend families, protect children online and ensure that web giants pay their fair share into the Canada Media Fund. We are there for creators and Canadians, but not for this so-called Conservative mantra of freedom of speech, which is unacceptable.
67 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/17/23 3:02:31 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, like other people around the world, Canadians are feeling the pinch from the global rise in inflation. Although Canada's inflation rate has continued to fall in the past eight months, it is still too high.
Can the Minister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance tell the House how budget 2023 is going to help Canadian families make ends meet?
63 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
