SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 218

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 21, 2023 02:00PM
Context: House Hansard - 218 - Jun/21/23
The Speaker
I declare the motion carried. Accordingly, the bill stands referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
19 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
  • Jun/21/23 4:10:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Pursuant to order made on Thursday, June 23, 2022, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at second reading stage of Bill C‑321, under Private Members' Business.
38 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
I declare the motion carried. Accordingly, the bill stands referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.
19 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
Pursuant to order made on Thursday, June 23, 2022, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at third reading stage of Bill C-282 under Private Members' Business.
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
I declare the motion carried.
5 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
  • Jun/21/23 4:36:04 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Sydney—Victoria is rising on a point of order.
14 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
Is it agreed? Some hon. members: Agreed.
7 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Jaime Battiste
Mr. Speaker, with all of the different events going on for National Indigenous Peoples Day, I was unable to change my vote on Zoom. I would like unanimous consent to change my vote on Bill C-321 to be in favour.
41 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
  • Jun/21/23 4:37:02 p.m.
  • Watch
I am now ready to rule on the point of order raised on June 20, 2023, by the chief opposition whip concerning the enforcement of the rules of decorum. In her intervention, the whip explained that she was rising with respect to the right of the member for Lethbridge to speak in debate on business then before the House. Earlier in the sitting, a series of exchanges led the member for Lethbridge to accuse the Minister of Canadian Heritage of lying. The member was called to order by the Assistant Deputy Speaker and Deputy Chair of Committees of the Whole. The chief opposition whip indicated that she accepted this decision. However, she felt that, given the member subsequently apologized, there was no reason to continue to bar her from participating in the proceedings. The whip finished her intervention by emphasizing the need for an “even-handed application of the rules”. The Parliamentary Secretary to the Government House Leader countered that the Assistant Deputy Speaker acted appropriately. He pointed out that she made several attempts to bring the member for Lethbridge to order, before informing the member that she would not be recognized for the remainder of the day. The members for New Westminster—Burnaby and Elgin—Middlesex—London also made interventions. When this point of order was first raised, I committed to review what occurred. I have now done so. The member for Lethbridge, while the Minister of Canadian Heritage was responding to her question during debate, persisted with the heckling, ultimately accusing him of lying. The Assistant Deputy Speaker, who was in the chair at the time, repeatedly asked the member to cease with the heckling. The Assistant Deputy Speaker informed the member of the consequences she would face, namely that the member would not be recognized for the remainder of the sitting. Since the heckling did not cease, the Assistant Deputy Speaker indicated that this sanction would be applied. Moreover, following a point of order from the parliamentary secretary to the government House leader, she was asked to apologize for using unparliamentary language, having accused the minister of lying. The member did make an apology but qualified it by using a different formulation of words. The Assistant Deputy Speaker commented on the nature of the apology. She reiterated that the member would not be recognized for the rest of the day, as had been decided prior to the request for an apology for the use of unparliamentary language. House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition, at page 646 states, and I quote: Members rarely defy the Speaker's authority or risk evoking the Chair's disciplinary powers. If a Member challenges the authority of the Chair by refusing to obey the Speaker's call to order, to withdraw unparliamentary language, to cease irrelevance or repetition, or to stop interrupting a Member who is addressing the House, the Chair has recourse to a number of options. The Speaker may recognize another Member, or refuse to recognize the Member until the offending remarks are retracted and the Member apologizes. As a last resort, the Chair may “name” a Member, the most severe disciplinary power at the Speaker's disposal. As a result, I cannot find fault with how the Assistant Deputy Speaker handled the situation. Having called the same member to order four different times in the space of about a minute, it should not come as a surprise that she chose to apply a sanction. The chief opposition whip may find the sanction excessive, but I trust each chair occupant to do what is appropriate in the circumstances. I also trust members to do their utmost to maintain order and decorum at all times, and when it has been given, to heed the direction of the Chair. I note that later in the sitting yesterday, some members equated the sanction applied with censorship, which only serves to undermine the Chair's authority. If members wish to participate in debate, they need to respect the rules that we have all agreed to. Presiding over the House can be a challenge even at the best of times. The chair occupants, to whom members have entrusted the conduct of our proceedings, depend on the co-operation of all members in maintaining order. Over the course of the past weeks, we have seen examples from both sides of the House of how various accusations quickly devolve into a difficult work environment, which borders on bullying, I might add. In each instance where the chair occupant has been called to intervene, they have attempted to restore order and ensure our rules are respected. Once a ruling is delivered, the matter is considered closed. I take the remark seriously of the need for the Chair to be always even-handed, as voiced by the chief opposition whip. I will take the opportunity to state firmly that I and all chair occupants strive to be fair, balanced and equitable when presiding over the business of the House. We endeavour to do this every day. We will continue to do so. I thank the other chair occupants for their support and commitment to the House, and all members for their attention.
872 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mrs. Stephanie Kusie
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Unfortunately, similar to the member for Sydney—Victoria, I also voted incorrectly, or did not apply my intention to the vote correctly, for Bill C-321. I would like to ask for unanimous consent to change my vote from nay to yea.
52 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
Does the hon. member have unanimous consent to change her vote? Some hon. members: Agreed
15 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Speaker
  • Jun/21/23 4:44:49 p.m.
  • Watch
It is my duty to lay upon the table, pursuant to subsection 23(2) of the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, a certified copy of the report of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of Quebec. Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), this report is deemed permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
59 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Mark Gerretsen (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (Senate), Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:45:26 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8)(a), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's responses to three petitions. These will be tabled in an electronic format.
34 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre, Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:45:54 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), I have the honour to present to the House, in both official languages, the report of the Canadian Delegation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe's parliamentary assembly, respecting its participation at the 20th autumn meeting in Warsaw, Poland, from November 24 to 26, 2022.
57 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Ms. Julie Dzerowicz (Davenport, Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:46:29 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), I have the honour to present to the House, in both official languages, the full reports of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association, respecting its participation at the 67th annual session in Lisbon, Portugal, from October 8 to 11, 2021, and the Parliamentary Transatlantic Forum in Washington, D.C., United States of America, from December 5 to 7, 2022.
66 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mrs. Alexandra Mendès (Brossard—Saint-Lambert, Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:47:03 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), I have the honour to present a report to the House in both official languages. It is the report of the Canadian branch of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, respecting its bilateral visit to the United Kingdom, London, England, and Cardiff, Wales, from January 18 to 20, 2023.
55 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. John McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood, Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:47:35 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the fifth report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, entitled “The Cyber Defence of Canada”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to this report. I want to commend all members who had such a co-operative and hard-working attitude toward the development of this report.
70 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Sean Casey (Charlottetown, Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:48:29 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 15th report of the Standing Committee on Health, in relation to Bill C-284, an act to establish a national strategy for eye care. The committee has studied the bill and has decided to report the bill back to the House with amendments. I would like to congratulate the sponsor, the hon. member for Humber River—Black Creek, for being perfectly impatient in guiding the bill to this stage, and committee members for their thoughtful and thorough consideration of the bill and amendments.
97 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mrs. Jenica Atwin (Fredericton, Lib.)
  • Jun/21/23 4:49:32 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 10th report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, entitled “Arctic Security and Sovereignty, and the Emergency Preparedness of Indigenous Communities”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to this report. I would like to thank all committee members for their incredible work, our witnesses, our analysts, our clerks and our support teams. I would like to wish everyone a happy National Indigenous Peoples Day.
90 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. René Arseneault (Madawaska—Restigouche, Lib.)
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-347, An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 (oath of office). He said: Madam Speaker, today, I am pleased to introduce, seconded by the hon. member for Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook, Bill C‑347, an act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867, with regard to the oath of office. This bill amends section 128 of the Constitution Act, 1867, in order to provide that, before taking their seat, members of the Senate and the House of Commons can choose to take and subscribe the oath of allegiance or an oath of office, or both. The fifth schedule to the Constitution Act, 1867, would be amended by adding the following after the oath of allegiance: “I A.B. do solemnly affirm that I will perform my duties in the best interest of Canada and in accordance with its Constitution”. I want to be very clear. The purpose of the bill is not to detract from the monarchy's historic role in Canada but to provide an additional option for members and senators when they are sworn in. I therefore invite all parliamentarians to support this bill when the time comes.
204 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border