44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 23, 2023 10:00AM
Mr. Speaker, I find it shocking that the hon. member would not stand with the government when we are standing up for Canadians. I remember an NDP that would stand for consumers, stand for Canadians and stand for our country.
I enjoy the member. Instead of criticizing, he should join us and fight for Canadians and express the outrage of millions of Canadians. That is what we did. That is what we will continue to do.
Mr. Larry Brock: Oh, oh!
Hon. François-Philippe Champagne: Mr. Speaker, I hope he is going to vote for Bill C-56 to make sure we have more competition in this country.
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:35:22 p.m.
- Watch
Before I proceed to the member for Calgary Forest Lawn, I want to ask the member for Brantford—Brant to please only use his voice when it is his time to.
The hon. member for Calgary Forest Lawn has the floor.
42 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:35:37 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, this week's Liberal-NDP inflation-fuelling false hopes update is not worth the cost. Prices are up, rents are up, debt is up and taxes are up, and after eight years, time is up for the Prime Minister. The $20 billion of new inflationary spending is ballooning the debt. Next year, the Prime Minister will spend more tax dollars on the interest to his debt than on health transfers.
Why is the Prime Minister giving more money to bankers and bondholders while Canadians go broke and hungry?
90 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:36:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the member opposite's question gives me an opportunity to let him know what is up. What is up in this country is home construction. Our fall economic statement has indicated that we are building more homes from coast to coast to coast, right across this great country, because that is what Canadians need right now. It also contains important measures that will strengthen competition in this country and help stabilize prices. What is down is inflation in Canada.
81 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:36:42 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, she wants to talk about housing. The only thing they did for housing was change the name of the housing department. Canadians want results; they do not want more photo ops. Rents are up and mortgages are up. The needed down payment for a house has doubled. After eight years, the Liberal-NDP government is not worth the cost.
When will they stop the photo ops and build more homes, not more bureaucracy?
75 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:37:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, it is fascinating and clear that the hon. member has not read the document. He seems to have missed $15 billion in low-cost loans, which is going to get Canada building. He missed a $1-billion investment to keep affordable housing going. He missed the fact that we are cracking down on short-term rentals to release tens of thousands of homes to increase supply.
When I look at their plan, they want to raise taxes on home builders by putting the GST back on, they want to cut funding for cities that build homes with the housing accelerator fund and they want to add layers of bureaucracy to do it. We are going to do what it takes to get more homes built. I invite the Conservatives to join us.
134 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:37:46 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, after eight years of the Liberal government, everything is up. Mortgages are up, rent payments are up, inflation is up, groceries are up and taxes are up, yet the Bank of Canada has asked for help keeping inflation down. It has asked for governments to limit their spending growth to 2.5% each year, except guess what the government just announced: An increase in growth of spending of over 5% for next year.
Is the minister trying to make misery go up for Canadians too?
87 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:38:19 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I can hardly believe that the Conservatives are talking about taxes. We reduced taxes for middle-class Canadians on two occasions, and the entire Conservative caucus, every single Conservative member, voted against lowering taxes for the Canadians who needed it most.
The fall economic statement we put forward this week shows the strong fundamentals of our fiscal frame. We have the lowest deficit among all G7 countries and we will have the highest growth in 2024 among all G7 countries. We are proud of our record. We are continuing to be there for Canadians.
96 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:39:01 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the government's record is inflationary deficits driving up the cost of living. In fact, one year ago, the finance minister stood in the House and presented a plan that would balance the budget in 2027. When asked whether that was by mistake or by design, the minister took great boastfulness in saying that it was deliberate and by design. Except now we learn that the budget will be balanced in the year never.
Does the government actually have a plan to ever balance the budget and bring down inflationary deficits so Canadians can keep their homes?
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:39:36 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, what is up is our ranking in the world. What is up are the number of jobs that we have created in the country. What is up is the prosperity in the country.
We rank third in the world now for foreign direct investment. We have seen landmark investments in the auto sector, in the mining sector, in biomanufacturing, in steel and in aluminum.
Canada is winning on the world stage, while the Conservatives want to bring us back to the Stone Age.
85 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:40:13 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, after eight years of the Liberal government, we know that prices are up, rent is up, mortgage rates, taxes are up, and we know Canadians are fed up with the current government.
Just this week, the government chose to spend an additional $20 billion, which go toward our overall national debt load. This means that now just the interest will cost Canadians $51 billion per year. That is enough to build 25 new hospitals and hire a whole host of new doctors. Imagine the difference that would make for Canadians.
Why is the Prime Minister choosing to support wealthy bankers instead of the health care needs of Canadians?
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:40:55 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, when we unveiled our plan to build more homes across the country faster, the Conservative leader called that disgusting. When the Conservatives talk about the spending that they would cut, they are talking about removing supports that Canadians need. They are talking about taking away the benefits that Canadians rely on, benefits for seniors, for families and for people who need them most.
The plan of austerity that the Conservatives are proposing is not worth the risk.
79 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:41:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the member did not respond to my question, so perhaps she did not understand it. I will ask it again.
There are $51 billion spent every single year just on interest toward our national debt. That is enough to build more than 25 brand new hospitals and hire a whole host of new doctors. It is twice as much as what the government is willing to spend on our national defence.
Are the men and women who wear a uniform and protect our front line not worth more than the out-of-control spending spree that the government selfishly takes upon itself?
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:42:10 p.m.
- Watch
Here is the inconvenient truth, Mr. Speaker. In order for the party opposite to do what it is talking about, it would have to cut massively into every aspect of the federal government.
The member talked about health care. We are making historic investments right now to ensure that the health care system is public and there for Canadians. When we heard about common-sense Conservatives in Ontario, we saw a direct attack against public health care.
Will those members cut dental care? Will they cut the transfers? Will they cut the critical supports that are there in health care and promotion? Exactly what kinds of cuts are they going to do?
112 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:42:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, asylum seekers are the responsibility of the federal government. That is why Quebec wants to be reimbursed for the services we provide, including housing and social services.
The federal government refuses to reimburse Quebec. The Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship said, and I quote, “I don't have $400 million just lying around”.
First of all, it is not $400 million; it is $460 million. Second, when the time came to help asylum seekers, Quebec managed to come up with the $460 million, so the minister will just have to come up with it, as well.
Will he reimburse Quebec?
109 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:43:32 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, a relationship is a two-way street. Yes, we received the letter, but responsibility for asylum seekers is shared with Quebec. It is shared with all the provinces and territories.
I could also send a bill for $450 million to Quebec. We have sent Quebec $600 million. There is also a $700-million fund under the Quebec-Canada accord that grows every year. Whatever Quebec's immigration levels are, Quebec must assume its responsibility. We are prepared to sit down and discuss this with our respective finance ministers.
92 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:44:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, if we look at the Constitution, we see that asylum seekers fall under federal jurisdiction. The federal government not only is not providing the services, but it is refusing to pay.
It is always the same thing with the Liberals when it comes to immigration and refugees. They say that they defend asylum seekers, but only when it comes time to make fine speeches. When it is time to truly welcome these people, the Liberals are not there. There is no service or reimbursement.
Quebec provides asylum seekers the services they need. Now, will the federal government do the one job that it is paid to do and reimburse Quebec?
112 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:44:43 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, a lesson on the Constitution from the Bloc Québécois, I will leave it at that. What I can say is that, last year, we gave $700 million to Quebec under the Canada-Quebec accord. We gave it more this year. We even gave it too much without asking for any of it back.
All I am saying is let us have a reasonable discussion with our respective finance ministers. Let us sit down and lay our cards on the table and have a mature discussion.
92 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:45:15 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I can tell him about discussions. The Quebec minister for Canadian relations said, and I quote:
The current policy of the federal government is: “We decide. You pay.” Ottawa prides itself on being the most generous country, one that welcomes all those who are suffering, but Quebeckers are the ones who have to pay. It makes no sense. This is definitely not a responsible policy.
That is what the Quebec minister for Canadian relations said. Quebec is welcoming and generous to asylum seekers. All it is asking for is the resources to continue to be that way.
When will the government reimburse Quebec?
107 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Nov/23/23 2:45:55 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I will give the same answer to the same question. Let us not forget that, in addition to the lump sum social transfer that is sent to all of the provinces, we are sending more and more money to Quebec every year under the Canada-Quebec accord, regardless of the levels in Quebec.
Quebec has a role to play in welcoming asylum seekers and all immigrants. We are prepared to sit down with Quebec to have a mature discussion between two responsible governments.
85 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
