SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 339

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
September 19, 2024 10:00AM
  • Sep/19/24 2:29:43 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the citizens of LaSalle—Émard—Verdun for putting their trust in the Bloc Québécois. The truth is the Bloc Québécois is in the best position it has been in over 15 years. If increasing the number of Bloc members was our priority, an election would have already been called. However, our priority is Quebeckers. Quebeckers are concerned about the living conditions of seniors, among other things. That is why we are asking the Liberals to stop financially discriminating against seniors aged 65 to 74. Are they finally going to increase old age security by 10% for that age group?
117 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Sep/19/24 2:30:50 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals need to understand something. It is very simple. They have two choices, and both choices come at a cost. Either they increase old age security by 10% for seniors aged 65 to 74, or they will pay for it, politically speaking. The Liberals will have to make a choice, and so will the other parties. If they think that seniors' pensions are not important, then they better have the nerve to tell seniors to their faces. The Liberals are going to pay for it one way or another. Will they increase old age security by 10%, yes or no?
103 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Sep/19/24 2:44:06 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, let us not forget that seniors are watching us. They have had it with evasive answers. It is time for decisions. All year, I have been meeting with seniors throughout Quebec, and they are unanimous. The Liberals have to increase old age security for people aged 65 to 74, just like they did for people 75 and older. It is urgent. There is no justification for creating two classes of seniors. Will the Liberals end this by raising old age security by 10% starting at age 65?
89 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border