SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Committee

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 19, 2023
Context: Committee Business Bill C-290, An Act to amend the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act (OGGO) - Jun/19/23
The Chair
  • 05:20:41 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
It is NDP-15.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Majid Jowhari
  • 05:20:44 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
It's NDP-15. Okay. Thank you very much.
9 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Greg Fergus
  • 05:20:54 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I apologize. I was looking at NDP-16.
8 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:20:59 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I apologize, Mr. Johns. I think someone was debating a different amendment. Do you have anything on amendment NDP-15, Mr. Fergus, or can we go to a vote?
29 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Greg Fergus
  • 05:21:07 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I agree with Mr. Johns' amendment NDP-15 completely.
9 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:21:20 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Okay. Shall NDP-15 carry then? (Amendment agreed to on division [See Minutes of Proceedings]) The Chair: On amendment NDP-16, we have Mr. Johns.
25 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Gord Johns
  • 05:21:24 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
It requires the gathering and annual publication of statistics regarding the career and health trajectory of whistle-blowers as a direct performance indicator. There is a lack of direct performance indicators from PSIC. Virtually all accounts of federal whistle-blower experience in Canada reveal that careers ended, health was damaged and lives were shattered. There is no official data available regarding the career and health trajectory of whistle-blowers, and no attempt to acquire this. Only the federal government has the information, authority and resources to obtain this information, which is inaccessible to researchers and others for reasons of confidentiality, and this is critical to any effective five-year review of the act. Again, I'm hoping we can just vote on it.
123 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:21:24 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Go ahead, Mr. Fergus.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Greg Fergus
  • 05:22:08 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I won't repeat myself, sir, but what I pointed out before is my objection to this one. I'm hoping that people understand the importance of people's health records and the safekeeping of that confidentiality so that it doesn't follow them, track them or, unfortunately, get leaked. (Amendment negatived: nays 8; yeas 2 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
60 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:22:26 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Amendment NDP-16 is defeated. On amendment NDP-17, we have Mr. Johns.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Gord Johns
  • 05:23:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
[Technical difficulty—Editor] requires the gathering and annual publication of client satisfaction as a direct performance indicator. There is a lack of direct performance indicators for the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner. Multiple reports by the Auditor General and judicial review decisions show that PSIC incompetence, gross mismanagement and failure to provide due process, etc., always disadvantages the whistle-blower, so in consideration of PSIC's performance, the voice of whistle-blowers is completely absent and unavailable. This amendment would make data available and make public servants feel the protection and support, which would serve as an important direct indicator of PSIC's performance. The purpose of the PSDPA and Bill C-290 are to protect and support whistle-blowers, so whether or not public servants feel protected and supported is obviously absolutely central to whether the PSDPA is functioning as it needs to. Any review of the act that doesn't consider these metrics is an incomplete review, and if public servants don't feel supported and protected in making disclosures, far fewer of them will report wrongdoing and wrongdoing will continue to fester unreported, damaging the public interest. The reporting of this data would also motivate integrity commissioners and their staff to ensure due process for whistle-blowers. This would not require additional funds, because the evaluation of the performance matrix for the PSDPA requires measurement of whether employees feel supported and protected when reporting a wrongdoing under the act. In fact, the PSIC promised to conduct but has never conducted a client satisfaction survey of whistle-blowers. I'm hoping we can just vote on this too.
270 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:23:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Go ahead, Mr. Fergus.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Greg Fergus
  • 05:25:00 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Reasons similar to those for NDP-16 also apply to amendment NDP-17, in ensuring that there is consent from the whistle-blowers to be able to provide that private information. The second thing, again, is that this also covers a case where you're dealing with complaints that have gone to the commissioner, as opposed to ones that have been resolved internally or that the complainant has decided to pursue internally. This will effectively require an annual survey to be conducted by PSIC. Again, we're very concerned about how we might run the risk of releasing people's confidential situations and their current status, so the same reasons that we opposed NDP-16 apply to amendment NDP-17.
120 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:26:05 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Is there anything else, Mr. Johns? Mr. Gord Johns: No. The Chair: Can we go to a vote on NDP-17, Madam Clerk?
23 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Clerk of the Committee (Ms. Aimée Belmore)
  • 05:27:02 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Mr. Chair, the count is five yeas and five nays.
10 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:27:02 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I will vote yes. (Amendment agreed to: yeas 6; nays 5 [See Minutes of Proceedings]) The Chair: On NDP-18, it's Mr. Johns.
24 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Gord Johns
  • 05:27:02 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I will try to go as fast as I can. No additional funds are required. It requires the periodic gathering and publication of indirect performance indicators. There is little to no information available regarding public servants' perceptions of the effectiveness of the whistle-blowing system, the frequency of perceived wrongdoing, which is supposed to expose and deter, and the effectiveness of corrective actions. This makes it impossible to determine the trends that would tells us whether the legislation is having the intended effects. With this amendment, data would be available showing levels and trends in indirect performance indicators related to public servants' perceptions. These would provide a basis for a review and improvement of the legislation and its implementation, which are necessary for the regular reviews of the act to present a realistic picture of how effective the act is. This would not require additional funds. The public service employee survey questions are reviewed every cycle and there's no obstacle to adding these types of questions to it. In the U.S., the Office of Special Counsel has conducted three cycles of this type of survey, demonstrating an improving trend.
191 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:28:11 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Next is Mr. Fergus and then Ms. Kusie.
8 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Hon. Greg Fergus
  • 05:28:11 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I really disagree with my colleague on his statement that this would have no additional costs. In fact, this will have a significant additional cost. This is providing another survey of public servants, which is similar to the public service employment survey that is done every year. In digging deep on this, we found that each piece of PSES, the employment survey, costs well in excess of a million dollars a year. The entire budget for PSIC is just over a million dollars a year. To run the survey alone would increase the cost of the commissioner's office by 100%. This would be in addition to having a new function and responsibility for the commissioner, who doesn't do this. They would have to make sure they have new authorization to spend this money to conduct this survey. To let you know, the public service employment survey is only done biennially, every two years, for the purposes of finding out what we do, where public servants are at, how they are feeling, the status of their jobs. To have PSIC double this work will create additional costs and significant additional costs.
192 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 05:29:54 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Go ahead, Mrs. Kusie.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border