SoVote

Decentralized Democracy
  • 05:20:53 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
This is a technical coordinating amendment to ensure that Bill S-205 is in line with another bill that Parliament is studying, Bill C-21, should both bills be passed.
30 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • 05:21:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I actually see this very differently. When you look at G-3, clause 2, under.... I don't even know how to read this. In proposed subsection 810.03(8) on page 2 of the committee stage document, you will see that there's a reference that.... Proposed subsection 810.03(8) completely changes subsection 810.03(7), which references the firearms section. That actually doesn't make any sense. It changes it to subsection 810.03(9), which is not the firearms section. When you go farther down to proposed subsection 810.03(11), you'll see that it does it again when it speaks about “the defendant makes an application under subsection (10)”. It's changing.... It's amending the firearms section. This G-14 deals specifically with the firearms section. Technically, the firearms section in these two provisions should be dealt with before you contemplate anything dealing with G-14, because G-14 contemplates that Bill C-21 must be introduced prior. It may be moot if you deal with the firearms section. You can't deal with this without dealing with those two amendments first.
191 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • 05:23:16 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
This amendment, G-14, would make some changes to ensure that some of the changes in previous clauses line up with Bill C-21, and the previous clauses include clause 2. There's a condition that would be proposed under the new peace bond provision. Currently, it's proposed subsection 810.03(9) on page 4 of the bill. That's a list of conditions the defendants would have to comply with, or potentially comply with, if they're on a peace bond. In that list, the words “firearm part” are missing. “Firearm part” would be added by Bill C-21. I don't exactly know all the rules, but I don't believe it can be debated, since it deals with that clause. We haven't changed the numbering in that clause yet. This provision proposes new numbering to reflect a motion that would have passed.
151 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border