SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 52

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 4, 2022 11:00AM
  • Apr/4/22 4:23:10 p.m.
  • Watch
This is not a point of order. It is a point of debate. The hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons is rising on a point of order.
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 4:23:28 p.m.
  • Watch
What the hon. member is trying to do is make a point of clarification and not a point of order. Again, I have already indicated that the other one was not a point of order. It is a point of debate, as is this other member's point. The hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons has just a little over five minutes left, and then there will be 10 minutes for questions and comments. I would ask people to be patient. The hon. parliamentary secretary.
93 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 4:27:19 p.m.
  • Watch
That is a point of debate. The hon. parliamentary secretary.
10 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 4:27:57 p.m.
  • Watch
Again, I just want to remind members to be careful. I know that one of the Speakers spoke to this last week and indicated that people should be judicious, and very careful, in some of the words that they are using. Again, I just want to remind the hon. member that it is still a point of debate. I do want to remind the parliamentary secretary to get back to his speech and to try to keep it focused on the debate that is before the House. He has two minutes left before there are 10 minutes of questions and comments.
101 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 4:32:52 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I thank the parliamentary secretary for his speech. However, I am rather tired of hearing the Liberals brag about how they have taken such good care of seniors. In his speech, my colleague once again reminded us that the Liberals increased old age security for seniors aged 75 and up. However, in doing so, they are creating two classes of seniors. When we ask them about that, we either get an interminable yet empty speech about how they are, have always been, and will always be there for seniors, or we are told we are trying to pick a fight. I would therefore ask the parliamentary secretary to give me a yes or no answer without giving me an interminable speech or telling me I am trying to pick a fight. Does he agree that OAS should be increased as of age 65 in order to avoid creating two classes of seniors, yes or no?
157 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 4:54:56 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, a lot of what my colleague for Mirabel said I agree with, and there are a lot of questions I could ask. However, the question I will ask him is the question I asked the parliamentary secretary at the end of the last speech we heard, because it seemed like he deftly avoided giving a straight answer to the question. The question was around income inequality and whether it has gotten worse or better in the seven years that the Liberal government has been in power. I know that my hon. colleague has a background in economics, so I am sure he will find this an easy question to answer for the edification of the parliamentary secretary.
119 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 5:41:32 p.m.
  • Watch
We have to resume debate. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.
14 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 7:08:07 p.m.
  • Watch
The Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change.
18 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 7:12:16 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, if it is not a silver bullet, why are we giving them $50 billion for it? The fact is that this is not about whether the government wants to pat itself on the back or cite others who are. To get to 1.5°C means at least a 60% reduction by 2030. This is the first plan that is saying that the government is not actually going to do the range anymore: It is going to let go of the 45% part and aim for 40%. The potential pathway in this plan actually only adds up to 36%. The question for the parliamentary secretary is the same. It is whether the government is going to choose to rise to the moment that we are in, to move past the partisanship of it all, and to invest in the kinds of climate solutions that we know are required not just for a potential pathway, but to ensure that we put together the proposals and the investments we need to—
174 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/4/22 7:13:16 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. parliamentary secretary.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border