44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 4, 2022 02:00PM
- May/4/22 3:03:23 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I was in Quebec City yesterday to attend a conference on seniors' living conditions. It was hosted by the Coalition for the Dignity of Seniors, which represents 150,000 people.
All the attendees were unanimous in denouncing the Prime Minister for creating two classes of seniors. Everyone sees that the skyrocketing price of food and housing does not affect 74-year-olds differently than 75-year-olds. Unlike the Prime Minister, inflation does not discriminate based on age.
When will he increase old age security for all seniors starting at age 65?
94 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:04:03 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, since 2015, we have always been there for seniors, whether by increasing the guaranteed income supplement by 10% for the most vulnerable seniors or by investing in programs to help them.
We have always been there. To help seniors, we brought the retirement age back down from 67, where Mr. Harper set it, to 65. We improved the CPP, and Quebec followed suit with the QPP. We increased the GIS for 900,000 seniors. We made a one‑time payment of $500 to seniors 75 and older, and we will always be there for our seniors.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:04:45 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, obviously that is not enough. Continuing to be there for seniors does not simply involve telling people between the ages of 65 and 74 to go back to work if they need more money. That is not helpful; it is insulting.
What would be helpful is to give every senior $110 more a month, every month. That would keep their purchasing power from eroding and help them cope with unforeseen situations. That is what being there for seniors looks like, not giving them a one-time cheque just before an election to try to buy their vote.
When will the Prime Minister really be there for all seniors rather than dividing them into two classes?
117 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:05:25 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the fact that seniors are living longer and longer is good news. The challenge is that, as they live longer, their expenses go up too.
That is why we recognize that seniors aged 75 and older need a little bit more help. That is why we were there to give it to them. This will not take anything away from seniors between the ages of 65 and 75 since we also increased their benefits.
We are doing a little more for the most vulnerable seniors, those who are older. I think that is exactly what Canadians expect.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:06:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, special interest activists south of Canada's border are intending to go around existing legal processes to shut down Enbridge Line 5. Line 5 supplies 540,000 barrels of oil per day and fuels the economies of Ontario and Quebec. It is governed by the terms of the transit pipelines treaty between Canada and the United States, yet the Prime Minister says he is not interested in enforcing the terms of this treaty. This is critical.
Will the Prime Minister intervene today and defend Canada's interests?
89 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:06:46 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is a critical piece of infrastructure for both Canada and the United States. That is why we have been consistently and continually advocating for its continued operation with the Government of Michigan and the federal government in the United States, and continue to demonstrate how important our energy partnership is across the border.
We continue to be there to defend the interests of Canadians and of the people in northeastern United States. We will continue to be there to ensure that we are working as true partners on energy security for everyone across North America.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:07:26 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, energy security is what we need, but this pipeline has seen repeated attempts to shut it down. Last year, the government filed its brief with the U.S. court on a different attempt to shut down Line 5. Now it is pretending that there is no Canadian interest at stake in losing 540,000 barrels per day of critical energy delivery. Something has changed.
To the Prime Minister, is silence on Line 5 the price of buying the NDP's support for his government?
86 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:07:59 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, once again we see the Conservatives trying to invent conspiracy theories where there simply are none. We have consistently advocated for Line 5 and continually pressured both the company and the State of Michigan to resolve their differences. We have continually advocated in the United States at the highest levels in Washington and we will continue to. This is something we take very seriously, and we will continue to be there to fight for it.
77 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:08:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Line 5 pipeline is the energy lifeline for southern Ontario and Toronto. Millions of jobs in Canada depend on affordable gas. This pipeline is a vital link that directly impacts thousands of jobs in my riding. The imminent shutdown of this pipeline will mean shortages at the pumps and the doubling of gas prices.
Will the Prime Minister deviate from his usual lack of leadership and assure Canadians that Line 5 will not be shut down?
79 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:09:05 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is critical infrastructure for Canada and the United States. We have taken strong steps to defend Line 5, including formally invoking the bilateral pipeline treaty. I have raised Line 5 directly with President Biden, and I have emphasized its importance to the Canadian economy and North American energy security.
Ambassador Hillman and others in our government continue to raise Line 5 with U.S. officials. We will always stand up for Canadian workers and Canadian industry.
80 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:09:40 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I was shocked and then horrified to see the 10 Conservative members from Quebec remain silent about the possible eradication of abortion rights south of the border. That is so regressive.
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
40 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:10:06 p.m.
- Watch
Order.
The hon. member for Pontiac may start her question over.
11 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:10:38 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I was horrified and shocked as I sat here in the House and watched 10 opposition members from Quebec remain silent about the possible eradication of abortion rights south of the border. That is troubling.
Some hon. members: Oh! Oh!
43 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:11:06 p.m.
- Watch
I would ask members to come to order.
Some hon. members: Oh! Oh!
The Deputy Speaker: Order, please. I do not know what is in the air today.
The hon. member for Pontiac.
33 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:11:41 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know what the Prime Minister has to say about the official opposition's shameful reaction.
22 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:11:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for Pontiac for her question, and I share her sentiments. Every woman in Canada has the right to safe and legal abortion services.
The Conservative MPs' reaction to this recent news proves one thing: They would rather talk about me than address the issues that really matter to women and, frankly, to all Canadians.
As for us, we will always be there for women, and we will never question their right to choose. Shame on Quebeckers.
84 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:13:00 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Canada Revenue Agency is at it again. This time, it is being investigated by the Privacy Commissioner for betraying whistle-blowers who just want to do their work honestly. A CRA executive ordered them to make the deal and agreed that it was an “atypical process” to give sweetheart deals to big business.
Will the Prime Minister hold the CRA accountable and protect whistle-blowers?
70 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:13:36 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, an expert third party review found that there was no wrongdoing in this case, and the agency did not provide any form of preferential treatment to the taxpayer. We would like to remind the member that CRA is an independent agency and that at no point is political input sought for these sorts of matters.
We take the protection of employee privacy extremely seriously and believe that those who disclose serious wrongdoing must be protected. Our whistle-blowing law provides secure and confidential processes for disclosing serious wrongdoing in the workplace and protection for acts of reprisal.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:14:13 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there are so many pending investigations that it is hard to keep track of them all when it comes to the government across the floor. With the SNC-Lavalin scandal, we saw how the government would move mountains for its corporate friends. It fired the former attorney general and fired a former president of the Treasury Board, but for the CRA whistle-blowers, there is nothing.
Why do insiders always get ahead with the government while Canadians are left behind?
82 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:14:50 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, every step of the way, this government stands up for Canadians, stands up for workers and stands up for protecting our democracy, and we will continue to do exactly that.
While members opposite insist on making partisan, personal attacks against me, we will continue to stay focused on Canadians: on standing up for the middle class and those working hard to join it, on standing up for women and their reproductive rights and on standing up for doing things the right way for Canadians while the Conservatives try to sling mud.
93 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
