SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 66

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 6, 2022 10:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès)
  • May/6/22 11:03:32 a.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby.
8 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
The Deputy Speaker
  • May/6/22 12:32:29 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby is rising on a point of order.
15 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
The Deputy Speaker
  • May/6/22 12:34:29 p.m.
  • Watch
Order. We had another point of order or a continuation of the same point of order. The hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby.
24 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
Mr. Michael Barrett
  • May/6/22 12:35:43 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Mr. Speaker, the member who just spoke, the hon. gentleman from New Westminster—Burnaby, did say that I misinformed the House, and I would respectfully ask, in light of the verification offered by the table officers and by the Chair, that an apology be offered for having alleged that I misled the House.
54 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
The Deputy Speaker
  • May/6/22 12:36:08 p.m.
  • Watch
Would the hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby like to make a comment? I will afford him a minute.
20 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
Mr. Michael Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton, CPC)
  • May/6/22 12:47:06 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-5 
Madam Speaker, I was a little surprised to hear the member for New Westminster—Burnaby talk about petitions. The reason petitions have not been presented is because, every day, the Liberals have moved a motion to move to orders of the day, backed up by the NDP. With regard to the parliamentary secretary, it is quite ironic that he is the one who is holding up debate on the budget. He is the one who is debating the motion; no other hon. member. This was a very straightforward motion to allow the justice committee to do its work, having regard for the fact that the bill contains two substantive components: one with respect to the Criminal Code and the other with respect to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. It could have been moved forward with a vote on Monday. That hon. member is holding up debate on the budget, so I ask him this, very respectfully: Why is he wasting the House's time?
166 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 66 - May/6/22
Mr. John Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil, CPC)
  • May/6/22 1:29:12 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-19 
Madam Speaker, in the short time that I have, I will just remind the House that all of today could have been avoided had the question been put. We would have had a vote on Monday. We could have resumed the government legislation and debated Bill C-19, but instead, in a shockingly funny situation, the government moved time allocation on itself. I know that the member for New Westminster—Burnaby showed his complete indignation to the fact that petitions have not been read. The member supported the government moving to orders of the day all week. That is why they were not. I am seeking unanimous consent, and I hope that the others will agree, to move that the House proceed to presenting petitions today.
127 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border