SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 72

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 16, 2022 11:00AM
  • May/16/22 8:31:03 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, the member for Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston asked this question of the member earlier. One of the great debates of Confederation between Canadians in Upper Canada and Lower Canada at the time was about representation by population. In a Supreme Court decision regarding a case out of Saskatchewan, the Supreme Court talked about effective representation. The member represents quite a large rural riding in British Columbia, which comes with its own challenges. I wonder if she would speak to that. I represent the second-largest riding by population size in Canada, the largest in Calgary, of course, but it is a fairly small riding. I can drive from one end to the other in 20 minutes. I have one mayor to deal with and two or three city councillors. It is far more complicated for members who have multiple mayors, multiple city councils and large regions to travel through to do that effective representation. I would like to hear her comments on that.
166 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:32:05 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, I agree that there are multiple challenges. There are seven ferries in my riding and a lot of areas to cover. It is a great honour for me to do that work. It does mean that I spend a lot of time on the phone or travelling to speak with constituents. I represent 11 municipalities, over 20 indigenous communities and four regional districts within all of that. It takes up a lot of time, but I have to say that the communities in my riding are extremely effective at bringing issues that matter most to them to my attention. As we move through this, we have to look at how our democracy works, depending on whether it is for a large rural riding or a smaller urban riding. Both have specific challenges. I think of the member for Nunavut. Although her riding has a small population, it is such a vast area that she has to travel across to spend time with her constituents. All of us have challenges. It behooves all of us to listen to one another about what those challenges are and make sure that our democracy is reflective of the needs of our constituents. We are all here to serve the people of our ridings. It is important to make sure that their voices are heard. I will continue to do that.
228 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:33:23 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, the cornerstone of our democracy rests in people's ability to vote. We have heard from constituents over and over again. In particular, in my riding of Vancouver East, my constituents have consistently told me that they want to see a democratic system where every vote counts. Prior to the 2015 election, the Prime Minister promised Canadians that would be the last first-past-the-post election that we would have. Of course, when the Liberals formed government, that was all but forgotten, even though the House had engaged in extensive work with regard to proportional representation. I would like to ask the member for her thoughts about that. When the Prime Minister reneges on a promise like that, is the Prime Minister telling Canadians that they cannot trust what he promises? What damage does that do to our democratic system?
143 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:34:31 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, that is an important question. My response is it does break down those opportunities for connection with leadership. People want promises to be followed through on. It was most disheartening for me because of the amount of work that the committee did. It was a significant report. I really hope that all Canadians take an opportunity to at least read the recommendations. The report talked about the next steps that need to be taken. The minister of the day treated it as if it was too complex and that it did not do what it said it did, which I completely disagree with. These are important things. We have to follow through on our commitments. We have to let Canadians have a voice in that process. A promise was made, but the promise was not kept. Even the process of how that was laid out was absolutely flawed. It does breed cynicism, which can make all of our jobs much more difficult.
164 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:35:33 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, I really enjoy working with the hon. member in the time that we have been here, since 2015. I want to pick up on a point that the hon. member made. I recall when the electoral reform committee was constituted, there was a tremendous amount of work that went into it. The member for Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston was on that committee. There were recommendations that all of the opposition parties agreed to, not the least of which was to recommend the idea of proportional representation, but again, bring it to Canadians in a referendum. There can be an argument made as to where we go. I understand that the NDP is in favour of a citizens' assembly, but would she not agree with me and reaffirm that a promise was not kept by the Prime Minister? He did not get his preferred choice of voting, which would have been a ranked system, but more so, the issue of proportional representation, bringing it to Canadians and letting them decide on what type of voting system should be enacted is important.
183 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:36:48 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, I have enjoyed my time working with the member on different committees and in different roles. That is something all of us as members of Parliament should spend time talking about, how we work collectively across different party lines on things that matter to our constituents. I agree that we need to have a process. I do believe in a citizens' assembly, because it is those kinds of conversations that allow people to grow in their knowledge and wisdom on these issues. I know that a proportional system is very different from the current system of first past the post. I believe that we do need to have an education component to that, so that people can ask those hard questions and work out through the process what might be the best system that serves our country. I definitely have an opinion on that, but it is so important to have citizens doing that work. It is an important piece to take it out of the political realm. There is something to be said for having the communities make those decisions to come forward with recommendations and have politicians definitely listen to them. I look forward to continuing to work on that with the Conservative Party.
208 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:38:13 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-14 
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Pursuant to Standing Order 62, I move: That the hon. member for South Shore—St. Margarets be now heard.
29 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:38:48 p.m.
  • Watch
The question is on the motion. If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes to request a recorded division or that the motion be adopted on division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.
43 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:39:12 p.m.
  • Watch
On behalf of the official opposition, I ask for a recorded division.
12 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 8:39:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Call in the members.
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 9:22:48 p.m.
  • Watch
I declare the motion defeated. The hon. minister is rising on a point of order.
15 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 9:22:57 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I move: That the House do now adjourn.
10 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/22 9:23:43 p.m.
  • Watch
Pursuant to order made Monday, May 2, the motion is deemed adopted. Accordingly, this House stands adjourned until 10 a.m. tomorrow morning, pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). (The House adjourned at 9:24 p.m.)
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border