SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 90

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 16, 2022 10:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 90 - Jun/16/22
Mr. Philip Lawrence (Northumberland—Peterborough South, CPC)
  • Jun/16/22 1:36:29 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-9 
Mr. Speaker, one of the important changes in the legislation is the inclusion of the review and hearing panel system. I was wondering if the member could tell everyone what the difference between a review and a hearing panel is.
40 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 90 - Jun/16/22
Ms. Lisa Marie Barron (Nanaimo—Ladysmith, NDP)
  • Jun/16/22 5:10:17 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-9 
Mr. Speaker, I agree with so much that was said in the intervention by the member for Saanich—Gulf Islands today, again reinforcing the many reasons that we need to be moving forward with these changes to the Judges Act, getting this bill to committee and moving forward on what we are all agreeing on today. I may be new in this role as a member of Parliament, but I cherish every moment to stand up and speak in this chamber, and I hope that never changes. I reflect on the fact that our time may not be being used in the most efficient way right now. We have so much that is happening. I am hearing from constituents who are worried about the climate crisis that we are in and are struggling to make ends meet, and I am wondering if the member can share a bit about how she feels about using our time in the best way possible to speak to the concerns that we are hearing from constituents day in and day out.
178 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 90 - Jun/16/22
Mr. Mark Gerretsen (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (Senate), Lib.)
  • Jun/16/22 5:41:17 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-9 
Madam Speaker, I just want to thank the member for Barrie—Innisfil for that in-depth analysis of this bill, and for putting forward his position on it and how he feels about it. It was truly remarkable. He spent the first three minutes of his speech thanking the member for Fundy Royal for his hard work on it and indeed referenced the fact that the member for Fundy Royal had to do some in-depth analysis. I think his words were he had to “comb through” the legislation to look for changes. Could the member for Barrie—Innisfil inform the House of the changes the member for Fundy Royal came to conclude upon after that in-depth analysis of the bill?
126 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border