SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 95

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 23, 2022 10:00AM
  • Jun/23/22 2:23:31 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, there are handwritten notes confirming political interference during the active police investigation in Portapique, Nova Scotia in 2020. These notes are from a well-respected and experienced RCMP officer. Instead of honesty, we hear this minister doubling down on his rhetoric, disrespecting Parliament and Nova Scotia and blaming other people. Given the gravity of the situation, will the minister admit the political interference and stop this shameful performance?
70 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:25:15 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have absolutely no doubt that Superintendent Campbell is an exemplary officer, and I do not question his integrity in any way. I would simply remind this House that the fact is that there was no interference in this matter and the commissioner of the RCMP herself issued a statement on Tuesday, in which she said very clearly that there was no interference and no pressure brought to bear. Those are the facts. I would also remind the member opposite that we have initiated an independent public inquiry that is examining these very issues, and that work will be very important to the families of the victims of this tragedy.
112 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:31:39 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would remind the member that I have already stated unequivocally that there was no interference in this matter, and I would refer the member to the commissioner's statement, in which she also stated unequivocally that there was no interference or pressure. Canadians, including those who were directly impacted by this terrible tragedy, have expressed concerns about when and how the RCMP shared information with the public, and that is precisely why the government specified in the order of reference that the Mass Casualty Commission examine the communications approach taken both during and after this event. The work of the Mass Casualty Commission is important.
108 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:33:35 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I was referencing for this House the statement that the commissioner released on Tuesday, in which she said, “I take the principle of police independence extremely seriously, and it has been and will continue to be fully respected in all interactions.” That is the truth, and there was no interference in this matter, as there has been no interference by this government in any police operation.
70 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:34:39 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, let me be very clear. I am not in any way questioning the integrity or the honesty of the superintendent. I know former commissioner Paulson very well, and I take him very much at his word when he commends the officer for his integrity. However, I will just simply remind the House that, in this case, there was no interference in this matter and, second, that the commissioner has issued a statement in which she also says that there has been no interference in this matter. Those are simply the facts.
93 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:35:17 p.m.
  • Watch
Here are the facts, Mr. Speaker. A minister claims he did not interfere, but a senior RCMP officer, Mr. Campbell, says that there was in fact political interference. Who is telling the truth? Some very serious people say that Mr. Campbell is telling the truth. Peter Lepine also told The Globe and Mail, “I've followed Darren Campbell since the day he was a recruit. He's an extremely competent police officer and extremely well trained in the world of major investigations.” If we have to choose between the minister and Mr. Campbell, the Conservative Party chooses Mr. Campbell. Why does the minister refuse to acknowledge the truth?
110 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:37:55 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, during the April 28 meeting with the RCMP commissioner and Superintendent Campbell, there were notes handwritten that stated that the commissioner promised to release information about an active criminal investigation to support a pending announcement on gun control. The Minister of Emergency Preparedness has been standing in the House saying that there was no interference, but the Prime Minister just said there was no undue interference. The story is changing. The commissioner was working with the government to advance its political agenda. Does the minister deny this?
89 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 2:47:33 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, histrionics aside, I would direct the members to the commissioner's statement from Tuesday, in which she makes it very clear that there was no interference. However, I remind this House that Canadians, including those who were directly impacted by this tragedy, expressed very serious concerns about how and when the RCMP shared information with the public. In response to the concerns expressed by the victims and families in this terrible tragedy, our government specified in the order of reference to the Mass Casualty Commission that it examine the communications approach taken both during and after this event. That commission will hear testimony under oath, and its findings will be important in providing accurate information to the families in this terrible tragedy.
124 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/23/22 3:11:37 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would state that any criticism of Superintendent Campbell is crass political self-interest from the member opposite. There has been no criticism of Superintendent Campbell, just a simple statement of fact. The simple statement of fact is that there was no interference in this case. The commissioner has confirmed it. There was no interference, no pressure, no promise. Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
66 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border