SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 170

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 21, 2023 10:00AM
  • Mar/21/23 1:46:24 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-23 
Mr. Speaker, I am also of the opinion that Bill C-23 should be sent to committee so that we can make any necessary changes. My colleague ended his speech by talking about the challenges with this bill. Even just looking at clause 2, the definitions, I do not see a clear definition of what constitutes a person or place of national historic significance or national interest. I also do not see, in subclause 24(1), how much time the minister has to support a request for designation from the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada. Does my colleague see the same challenges? What other challenges does he see?
112 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/21/23 4:08:23 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-23 
Madam Speaker, I appreciate that it appears the Bloc is supporting at least the principles of the legislation. When we think of the contributions of heritage, and one could ultimately say our arts community makes us who we are as a nation, it is important that we recognize that heritage. We do that with a designation so people can advocate for names, places and events. It is important that we treasure and recognize it. What are the member's general thoughts on that principle?
84 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/21/23 4:21:34 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-23 
Madam Speaker, first of all, I would just like him to confirm that he did say he would like Leduc No. 1 to become a Canadian historic site. If so, would he agree that this is not the right time for that, since we are turning towards renewable energies instead? It seems to me that this historic site designation would be rather inappropriate.
64 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border