SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 181

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 20, 2023 10:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 181 - Apr/20/23
Mr. Michael Cooper
  • Apr/20/23 4:14:30 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, to answer the parliamentary secretary to the government House leader, the bill is fundamentally flawed. It is unsupportable on that basis. If it were a matter of a few amendments, it would make sense to send the bill to committee on the basis that the bill was supportable on principle, but that is not the case with the bill. Indeed, with respect to the consent provisions of the bill, the bill arguably would take a step back from the completely inadequate measures that were provided in PIPEDA.
89 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 181 - Apr/20/23
Ms. Lori Idlout (Nunavut, NDP)
  • Apr/20/23 4:31:29 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Uqaqtittiji, the NDP has been fighting for privacy rights and released a digital bill of rights several years ago. It has been trying to talk about consent provisions for years. Does the member agree that there needs to be strengthened wording regarding valid consent by restoring understanding in the PIPEDA under section 6.1 of the act?
57 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 181 - Apr/20/23
Mr. Joël Lightbound
  • Apr/20/23 4:48:48 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, it is a question that has come up many times, even when we look at PIPEDA historically. Why were political parties excluded? They seem to have fallen into a no man's land, in many respects, when it comes to privacy and data protection. I would be interested to know why and, if not, how we can work to better protect the data of Canadians when it comes to political parties. Definitely, it is a very worthwhile question that the member has raised.
85 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border