SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 207

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 6, 2023 10:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 207 - Jun/6/23
Hon. Pierre Poilievre (Leader of the Opposition, CPC)
  • Jun/6/23 2:22:05 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Johnston was forced to remain behind a veil of ignorance. By his own admission today, he said that he was not aware of information that the former Conservative leader already knew about the government in Beijing spreading disinformation using state organs. This is on top of learning today that Mr. Johnston hired a lifelong Liberal donor who was at a fundraiser with the leader of the Liberal Party just two years ago. In addition to other Liberal consultants and NDP strategists to do damage control, will we put an end to the act, fire this rapporteur and call a public inquiry now?
105 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 207 - Jun/6/23
Hon. Pierre Poilievre (Leader of the Opposition, CPC)
  • Jun/6/23 2:23:38 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is another reason it is so tragic that the Prime Minister has destroyed the reputation of this man. By putting a former member of the Trudeau Foundation in this terrible position and surrounding him with Liberal staffers, Liberal donors and Liberal lawyers, he has ruined perceived objectivity and caused a conflict of interest, one that he could reverse at any time. Why will the Prime Minister not put an end to the charade and launch a full public inquiry now?
83 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 207 - Jun/6/23
Mr. René Villemure (Trois-Rivières, BQ)
  • Jun/6/23 2:41:53 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, during this morning's committee meeting investigating Chinese interference, David Johnston explained why he believes a public inquiry had to be avoided. His reason? In his opinion, an inquiry would be expensive and time-consuming. Does anyone know what else is expensive and time-consuming? That would be the three months of work in progress since February that we have spent calling for an independent public inquiry, which is supported by everyone except the Liberals and their special rapporteur. The Liberals' resistance to shedding light on this matter is the expensive waste of time. It is damaging public confidence. When can we expect an independent public inquiry?
109 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 207 - Jun/6/23
Mr. René Villemure (Trois-Rivières, BQ)
  • Jun/6/23 2:43:08 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, what does Mr. Johnston recommend in lieu of the independent public inquiry that everyone is calling for? Mr. Johnston recommends himself. That is what he is offering us. Mr. Johnston is substituting himself for an inquiry, despite the fact that the House is asking him to step aside. He wants to hold his own hearings that will in no way be independent. David Johnston is the man who dismissed the idea of a public inquiry on the basis of information that he refuses to disclose. David Johnston wants to control what might be discussed in public at his own hearings. It may be less expensive, it may take less time, but it will be less clear. Is there anyone who would claim that this is not smoke and mirrors?
135 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border