SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 213

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 14, 2023 02:00PM
Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23
Mr. Emmanuel Dubourg (Bourassa, Lib.)
  • Jun/14/23 4:42:22 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 11th report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, entitled “New Contract for the Administration of Veterans Affairs Canada's Rehabilitation Program”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a response to this report. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the witnesses who appeared before us for this report, and to acknowledge the tireless work of the committee members, the analyst and the clerks who helped us.
92 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23
Mrs. Dominique Vien (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis, CPC)
  • Jun/14/23 4:45:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the supplementary report on behalf of the Conservative members of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women. Many witnesses expressed the need for the government to commit to conducting an independent, trauma-informed, survivor-led inquiry into maltreatment in Canadian sport. We believe that the terms of reference for the inquiry should include, among other things, an examination of the failure of sporting bodies to report or address breaches or alleged breaches of the Criminal Code to the proper authorities.
93 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23
Mrs. Tracy Gray (Kelowna—Lake Country, CPC)
  • Jun/14/23 6:30:51 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-22 
Madam Speaker, I thank the minister again for her intervention today. Part of the next stage of this, presuming this passes and becomes law, would then be to develop the regulations for this bill and to negotiate with the provinces and territories. This would all be done not through Parliament, not at committee but behind closed doors. While the government touts itself as being open and transparent, the way that this would play out would actually be behind closed doors. There would not be an opportunity to come back to Parliament. There would not be an opportunity to take any of the details of this benefit to committee to be analyzed, to have witnesses testify and to have amendments. My question to the minister is this. Would you consider this to be an open and transparent process going into the next stage?
142 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border