SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 235

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
October 19, 2023 10:00AM
  • Oct/19/23 12:13:27 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Madam Speaker, first of all, the member is wrong when he says that we did nothing with regard to jobs during the pandemic. We could talk about the wage subsidy program, the loans to small businesses and the rental supports, not to mention CERB—
45 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 12:47:30 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Madam Speaker, talk about manipulating numbers to try to make something look like what it is not. The member talked about, for example, LNG. It is one of the single largest investments, possibly in the top four or five, where we saw the federal government working with a provincial government, the NDP in B.C. It was us, the provincial NDP and the private sector working on an LNG project worth billions of dollars, yet the member just said we had nothing to do with LNG. The member talked about hundreds of thousands of jobs. Our government has created far more jobs than Stephen Harper ever did, and we have been in government for eight years compared to nine years. We do not need to be lectured about jobs. Why does the Conservative Party not recognize the value of the transition to ensure that we have good, healthy net-zero workforce jobs into the future for Canada's middle class? What does the member have against Canada's middle-class jobs?
171 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 1:20:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Madam Speaker, RBC has said that over 400,000 jobs are at stake by the end of 2030, so over the next seven years. What this legislation is looking to do is ensure we create more jobs in Canada. The member opposite rightly points to the fact the investment tax credits our government has introduced and is working on rolling out are going to play a key role in incentivizing the sustainable investments we are going to need across Canada to see growing industries in renewables and other facets of the energy transition that are going to create those jobs for people to transition to. I welcome that work, and I am sure we will be able to keep the member updated as that work gets to a point of conclusion.
131 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 1:22:02 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Madam Speaker, I know the language shifter, the lingo and the way we are talking about this has evolved. That evolution in language in talking about sustainable jobs is part and parcel of working with labour leaders across the country. I believe it actually reflects the language and framing they would like us to use. The evidence shows there is a lot at stake here. There is a lot of investment and potential economic growth. There are a lot of jobs at stake, and those jobs are truly sustainable jobs. They will be with us for generations to come as we make this green energy transition.
106 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 1:33:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Madam Speaker, in one word, wow. At the end of the day, it is becoming very clear that the Conservative Party does not give a darn about green jobs. The Conservatives do not recognize that there is value to green jobs. The Conservatives are prepared to write off Canada's middle class and those aspiring to be a part of it when it comes to good-quality green jobs. This bill is all about ensuring there is a council that can provide that five-year report on how we can transition and generate additional jobs. Let us think about the battery jobs from Volkswagen and other types of jobs. This is about tomorrow. Why do the Conservatives want to close their eyes or bury their heads in the sand like an ostrich? It does not make any sense. What do you have against good, clean middle-class jobs?
148 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 1:49:36 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Madam Speaker, that is a great question. I think what the people of St. Thomas would appreciate, instead of giving $31 billion between two plants for 3,000 jobs, is if the Liberals just gave each person $10 million so they never had to work again. They would probably be pretty happy about that, but that is not really the way to grow the Canadian economy. Conservatives have plans to actually unleash the innovation, technology and natural resources of Canada to grow the economy. Think about those 18 LNG plants and the number of jobs we could have had there. Think about the nuclear facilities we could be building and transporting around the world. That is where the jobs are.
120 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 5:01:50 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Mr. Speaker, I have a simple question. Why are we talking about sustainable jobs and not a just transition? Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Mr. Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay: Mr. Speaker, I cannot hear myself.
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 5:02:38 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Mr. Speaker, words do matter, and when we met with workers about what they wanted, they wanted to know there was a future. That was why the words “sustainable jobs” meant something. We heard that from workers. In terms of international obligations, we need to ensure in the legislation that this is not just an island by itself. It must meet the international commitments we have made on issues like the just transition. It is very important, when I am in Edmonton meeting with electrical workers who want to know what their future looks like, to say this is about jobs. This is about tomorrow. Once we have established trust with the working class, we will move further ahead because there is no energy transition without workers at the table. That is why the language matters.
138 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/19/23 5:20:36 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-50 
Mr. Speaker, one thing we heard at committee recently was that workers in the traditional energy sector have jobs that pay really well. Compare that to the jobs that will be and currently are created by green tech companies, whether in wind, solar or otherwise. On average, they pay about 36% less than what a traditional oil and gas worker earns. If this is a just transition would transfer people from job to job, does the member see anything in the bill that would ensure that the worker who is making money in oil and gas is going to be making the same amount when they are transitioned to a different job?
112 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border