SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 308

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 3, 2024 10:00AM
  • May/3/24 12:30:49 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier is rising on a point of order.
15 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:31:20 p.m.
  • Watch
I would ask for a bit of decorum in the House. I thank the hon. member for his point of order. Obviously, there is a difference between using that unflattering term to characterize a policy or a decision and using it to describe a person. That is how the Chair has interpreted the Standing Orders. I therefore invite the hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby to continue his speech. The hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby.
78 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:34:03 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Calgary Centre is rising on a point of order.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:34:38 p.m.
  • Watch
I thank the hon. member for Calgary Centre for his intervention. However, that is a matter for debate. I invite the hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby to continue his speech.
32 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:36:10 p.m.
  • Watch
I thank the hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby. Unfortunately, his time is up. We will move on to questions and comments. The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.
32 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:37:53 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Calgary Forest Lawn on a point of order.
12 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:38:05 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. NDP House leader knows the rules of the House. He cannot say who is present in the House and who is not. He has a few seconds left to finish his answer.
34 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 12:54:17 p.m.
  • Watch
Questions and comments, the hon. member for Nepean.
8 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/24 1:22:12 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I just want to set the record straight. My colleague spoke about hunting rifles. The Bloc Québécois has never been in favour of the list, which did not make any sense. We were the first to speak out against that. I would like to remind the House and my colleague that, when it comes to firearms, the Bloc Québécois's position is by far the most responsible one, at least in my opinion. We suggest respecting the rights of hunters while banning assault weapons, so that attacks like the one at the École polytechnique never happen again. In that regard, I would like to recognize the tremendous work done by my colleague from Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, who managed to negotiate and obtain something constructive. On one hand, we have the government, which wanted to restrict the rights of hunters. On the other, we have the official opposition, which wanted to continue to allow assault weapons. That is unacceptable. Attacks like the one at the École polytechnique must never be allowed to happen again. Will my colleague recognize my colleague's great work?
201 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border