44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 23, 2024 10:00AM
- May/23/24 10:37:56 p.m.
- Watch
- Re: Bill C-5
Mr. Speaker, Bill C-5 dealt with a number of issues that relate to mandatory minimum penalties, including the overrepresentation of indigenous and Black people in our justice system.
29 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:38:10 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, is there still a mandatory minimum penalty for robbery with a non-restricted firearm, yes or no?
19 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:38:22 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as I mentioned earlier in today's discussion, there remains a mandatory minimum penalty for people who are involved in a robbery with a restricted firearm, of five—
31 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:38:32 p.m.
- Watch
The hon. member for Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo.
9 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:38:34 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I am so glad the minister clarified that there is a mandatory minimum penalty for robbing somebody with a restricted or prohibited firearm. Does the minister think that this is what goes through somebody's head? “I am going to go commit a robbery of that 7-Eleven. Wait a minute. This is a restricted or prohibited firearm. Hold off. I am not doing it.” Does the minister think that is what goes through someone's head?
81 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:00 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, what is important to reflect on with respect to the mandatory minimum penalty discussion are the words of Ben Perrin, the former chief legal adviser to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who said, “MMPs are ineffective at reducing crime, may actually increase recidivism, are highly vulnerable to being struck down by courts as unconstitutional, can increase delays in an overburdened system and perpetuate—
66 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:22 p.m.
- Watch
3 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:25 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, if there are drive-by shootings with no mandatory minimum penalty, are you okay with that?
An hon. member: I have a point of order.
27 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:29 p.m.
- Watch
I understand that the point of order is going to be raised but I am going to presume that the hon. member for Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo is asking a question through the Chair.
We will have a very brief answer by the hon. minister.
46 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:41 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, what I am very concerned about is the use of firearms in offences and that is why we have taken significant action on assault rifles—
28 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:48 p.m.
- Watch
The hon. member for Regina—Qu'Appelle has five minutes.
11 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:39:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there has been so much misinformation from the Minister of Justice, so I am going to try one last time to get some clarity around some key points.
The NDP-Liberal government made a conscious decision to not just make it easier but actually force judges to grant bail for dangerous and repeat offenders. That was in their bill, Bill C-75. Since those changes in the government's bill, has the overall crime rate in Canada gone up or down?
83 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:40:31 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, Bill C-75 dealt with a number of things. It dealt with trial delays. It dealt with responding to Jordan. It dealt with changing how to select a jury trial after the Gerald Stanley matter and the systemic racism that was disclosed. It also dealt with enhancing penalties for things like auto theft, which that member voted against.
60 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:40:52 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I will get to auto theft in a moment, but first I want to just clarify: Bill C-75 made specific changes to make bail easier for dangerous and repeat offenders. I am not talking about any other aspect of bill C-75. Since those specific changes in Bill C-75, has the overall crime rate gone up or down in Canada?
64 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:41:13 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate that as a former Speaker, the member used to consult Speakers' decisions, but I also would appreciate that he knows about Supreme Court jurisprudence. What Bill C-75 did was codify a Supreme Court decision called “Antic”. The law was already in place. We took that law from the court cases and put it into the Criminal Code. That is what codification involves.
69 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:41:33 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, no judge ordered the government to make it easier to restrict judges from looking at other options, including keeping dangerous and repeat offenders in jail longer. The direct result of Bill C-75 is that Canada now has a catch-and-release bail system. The minister does not have to take my word for it. He can listen to the Victoria Police Department, which said in a statement, “Bill C-75, which came into effect nationally in 2019, legislated a 'principle of restraint' that requires police to release an accused person at the earliest possible opportunity”.
Let us look at what that language says. It specifically states, “a peace officer, justice or judge shall give primary consideration to the release of the accused at the earliest reasonable opportunity and on the least onerous conditions”.
Can the minister just answer a simple question? There are only two options: Since Bill C-75, either the crime rate went up or the crime rate went down. After nine years of the Liberal-NDP government, has the crime rate in Canada gone up or down?
187 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:42:45 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, with the utmost respect, I want to elaborate on a couple of points. First, when a court, such as the Supreme Court of Canada, renders a decision, the administration of justice and justice actors like myself follow that guidance. That is how the rule of law operates in this country.
Second, with respect to statutes, there is a guiding statute, a supreme statute. It is called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I know that is sometimes inconvenient for the members opposite, because they want to just trample on it using the notwithstanding clause, but that charter, including in section 11(e), safeguards a right to reasonable bail not to be denied without just cause.
These points are perhaps inconvenient for the member asking the questions, and certainly for his leader, but they are not an inconvenience for me or for our government. We stand by them to implement those charter rights and safeguard the rights of all Canadians.
161 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:43:36 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I understand why the minister is so desperate not to answer the question and is hiding behind things that he knows are just not true. It is because crime has gone up massively: Homicides are up 43% since the Liberal government took over, gang-related homicides are up 105%, and violent gun crimes are up 101%.
On the one hand, the minister talks about how bad mandatory minimums are; on the other, he brags that the government actually kept some mandatory minimums. It is completely incoherent. He is completely self-contradictory.
He talked about car thefts. Did the Government of Canada expand the use of conditional sentencing, in other words, house arrest, for criminals who steal cars, yes or no?
122 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:44:20 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the principle of restraint from the Antic decision does not dictate the outcome of a specific bail hearing. That is fundamental to understand. It does not require the release of a person. It does not change the basis upon which someone can be detained.
With respect to auto theft, for the member's edification, when something or someone is subject to a period of imprisonment of longer than two years, they are automatically immunized from the potential availability of a conditional sentence order. There is also a mandatory minimum penalty that applies for repeat auto theft offenders, and that also immunizes them from the potential conditional sentence order.
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/23/24 10:45:01 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is a very long way of saying, yes, the Liberals have granted house arrest to dangerous car thieves; as a result, car thefts have gone up massively—
31 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
