I listened intently to the member’s comments. At the beginning, I thought he was going in a direction that had something to do with the legislation. Over time, the emphasis of his comments really shifted. He started to get into OHIP+ and some other programs that aren’t in this legislation. So I guess, perhaps, I didn’t get a very clear picture of where he was coming from with regard to the actual legislation on the floor of the assembly. I mean, he made, I believe, a brief comment about carbon sequestration, but aside from that there were a lot of detours on this road trip that he took us all on.

Really, as he presented, I was hoping to get some clarity around what he actually thought of the legislation itself. So my question to the member opposite is, are you going to actually be voting for or against this legislation? Yes or no?