SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Ontario Assembly

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
February 27, 2023 09:00AM
  • Feb/27/23 4:20:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

Thank you. The member from Kingston and the Islands.

9 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:20:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

Great member.

2 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

Either member could answer this question. I just want to go back a little bit. When the Liberal party was in charge of the government, back in the majority days, Premier Kathleen Wynne’s government was trying to extricate itself from one privatization disaster, even as it sets itself up for another. That’s the Ornge one that they’re referring to. The current disaster of its handling of surgical clinics—Ontarians may recall the government’s decision to expand the scope of private clinics, announced with much fanfare by then health minister Deb Matthews in 2012.

I just need to ask the members a question: Do they support privatization of health care expansion or not?

116 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

I appreciate the revised history lesson from our new Liberal colleagues. I can appreciate that they weren’t elected during the 15 years when Liberal governments fired nurses and closed down hospitals, including the Peel Memorial Hospital, which is actually the hospital I was born in, in Brampton—and, actually, I guess the other previous Liberal members in the previous government also voted against rebuilding that hospital in Brampton, to get a second hospital at the site of Peel Memorial. So I can appreciate that these members might—

When we talk about corporate profiteering and privatization—

96 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

Questions?

A quick response.

4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

To the member from Don Valley East—interesting presentation, isn’t it? Fifteen years to get absolutely nothing—absolutely nothing.

One of the aspects of our plan supports expanding the number of physicians that can join a family health team. I’m from a region that has a million people. The people that I represent, 149,000 people—this is something they want, this is something I hear at the doors that I knock on, every other weekend.

Can the member for Don Valley East tell me whether he supports increasing access to family health teams?

96 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

My question is to the doctor. He said the Ontario Hospital Association has said very clearly to this government that Bill 124 shouldn’t be extended. I think that’s pretty clear.

What I’ve never understood is why a labour minister on that side of the House, who is supposed to be non-partisan, is supporting and continues to support Bill 124. I hope he hears me; I don’t know if he can hear me or not, but I hope he does.

You also said that performance is better in not-for-profit compared to profit. When I look at long-term care, because I’m the critic, 5,400 people died in long-term care; approximately 3,800 of them died in private long-term care.

My question to you is, do you agree that everything should stay not-for-profit?

144 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

We stand categorically against Bill 60 and the way in which it gives way to corporatize profiteering in our health care system. There is absolutely no room for that. We have been clear. I campaigned as a Liberal in the last election saying that there is room to move some surgeries out of hospitals in a not-for-profit model with adequate guardrails. That remains our position. To be clear, we are entirely against the profiteering and corporatization being proposed under this legislation.

We’ve seen the corrupting effects of profiteering in our health care system. We’ve seen how Bill 124, for example, has pushed nurses out of public health care. Things like temporary, for-profit nursing agencies, which have proliferated under this government, have subsequently pulled nurses out of public health care.

It’s why, in my unwavering commitment to protect our public health care system, I introduced legislation that will hold these nursing agencies to account, that will commit to and strengthen our publicly funded health care system. It’s what I have done as a physician, it is what I am doing as an opposition critic, and it is what I and the rest of the Liberal caucus will always do.

The member across also made the allegation that nothing happened under the previous 15 years of Liberal government. I would point out that the most immediate five years of performance under this Conservative government have been the worst years in this province’s entire history. I would caution the member about any sort of chest-thumping, given the current state of our health care system.

On repeated occasions, the Minister of Health has been very clear that she didn’t believe that there was a problem in the first place. I recall quite vividly that she cited a 1-800 number, I believe, to anyone who believes that they have been upsold and upcharged, in frank contradiction to what the Auditor General has been telling us.

And so, amidst that backdrop, amidst this problem that we know is objectively a problem, this government now expects us to believe that, coming out of that fantasy land, they can be trusted to protect against upcharging and upselling with this new fallacy of a plan? It simply is not credible.

Thank you for your question.

Report continues in volume B.

387 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

I would like to pick up on your information—I thought it was very interesting—about how the director is being appointed and why that difference is there. I would refer back to the Auditor General’s value-for-money audit, and I’m going to quote from that report. She said, “We found that some patients could be given misleading information as part of sales practices to make a profit.

“Several of our findings, such as the underuse of hospital operating rooms, and the lack of ministry oversight ... have been noted in our past value-for-money audits.”

So the Auditor General has identified the lack of oversight, has identified that profiteering is a problem. I would give you an opportunity to comment on it. We haven’t even addressed the Auditor General’s recommendations, and now they’re doubling down on the lack of oversight and profiteering.

149 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/27/23 4:30:00 p.m.
  • Re: Bill 60 

I find it interesting hearing the Liberals. But I guess when the Liberals were in power, they didn’t have to worry about health care because they were just driving 300,000 families and businesses out of the province. They didn’t think we had people, because there really wasn’t any jobs for them, so they just assumed there would not be any people so we wouldn’t have to fix health care. But health care does need to be fixed. This government is the government that is fixing health care by looking outside the box and making sure this happens.

My question to the members opposite is: We launched the largest health care recruiting initiative in Ontario’s history; will the member opposite support the future of our publicly funded health care system by supporting this bill?

139 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border