Further response? I recognize the member for Kitchener Centre.
On the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, Mr. Oosterhoff replaces Mr. Kanapathi; and
On the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, Ms. MacLeod replaces Mr. Byers, Ms. Vaugeois is removed, and Mr. Ke is added; and
On the Standing on Finance and Economic Affairs, Ms. Pierre replaces Mr. Dowie; and
On the Standing Committee on Justice Policy, Mrs. Stevens is removed and Mr. Mantha is added; and
On the Standing Committee on Social Policy, Mr. Clark replaces Mr. Riddell, Ms. Kusendova-Bashta replaces Ms. Barnes, and Ms. Gallagher Murphy replaces Ms. Pierre; and
On the Standing Committee on Heritage, Infrastructure and Cultural Policy, Mr. Kanapathi replaces Ms. Kusendova-Bashta, and Ms. Clancy is added; and
On the Standing Committee on the Interior, Mr. Riddell replaces Ms. Gallagher Murphy; and
On the Standing Committee on Government Agencies, Mrs. Gretzky is removed and Ms. Jama is added.
Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry?
I appreciate the comments from the member for Kitchener Centre about the concerns that her community has raised over the changes to the official plan. I’m curious to know, as a new member of this House, what her opinion is on a process that sees the government bring forward MZOs without community consent, then brings in legislation to reverse all those MZOs, and then brings in new legislation to un-reverse some of those MZOs. Does the minister think that that is a good use of the legislative time that we have available to us in this chamber? Does it address the real concerns of the people of this province?