44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 5, 2024 02:00PM
- Jun/5/24 2:51:22 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, all the Conservatives are asking is for the report to be released so Canadians can see the results, because Canadians are the ones who are paying for this expensive, failed Liberal scheme.
When the government goes to the trouble of putting together a report and doing an analysis, but keeps the report a secret and does not even allow the Parliamentary Budget Officer to talk about it, we have to wonder how bad it is.
When will the Liberals end the cover-up and release the report?
89 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:51:55 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, for the Conservatives, that is not what the PBO said. The Parliamentary Budget Officer issued a report, about a month and a half ago, saying that he accidentally overestimated the economic impact of the carbon price on Canadians.
I would like to re-emphasize for Canadians that eight out of 10 Canadians get more money back through the Canada carbon rebate than they pay in the price on pollution. As a reminder, the next payment for the Canada carbon rebate will go out on July 15 in the summer.
92 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:52:30 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals are hiding the truth from Canadians. The environment minister is refusing to release a secret government report that proves the carbon tax is costing Canadians more than they get back.
In fact, the Liberals have placed a gag order on their own budget watchdog, blocking him from speaking about this damning report. Canadians already know the carbon tax is a complete scam.
When will the Liberal minister release his secret report and end his carbon tax cover-up?
82 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:53:04 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to remind the member opposite that, thankfully, we all passed the FES last week. That means, in the member's riding in Manitoba, a family of four is going to receive $1,440 with the rural top-up. In my riding, in Newfoundland and Labrador, it is $1,430. In Alberta, it is $2,160.
No matter how we do the math, eight out of 10 families are better off with the carbon rebate, especially families in rural Canada. They have the top-up.
89 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:53:38 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, after nine years of this Liberal government, the cost of living is too high and Quebeckers are paying the price. Once again this week, the Bloc-Liberal coalition voted against pausing federal gas taxes to give Canadians a break. Worse still, the Bloc Québécois wants to radically increase taxes on the backs of Canadian families. The Parliamentary Budget Officer confirmed this week at the Standing Committee on Finance that the government has a secret report that proves the economic impact of the carbon tax.
When will the Prime Minister release the report that proves that the Conservatives and Canadians are right?
107 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:54:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is nonsense. Eight out of 10 families get more money back in their pockets than they pay as part of the carbon price because of the rebate, in regions where the price applies. It is very simple. All the proceeds from the price on carbon are redistributed equally to all families. The wealthiest pay more than they get back. Middle-class families get more back than they pay. It is as simple as that. Eight out of 10 families are getting more money back in their pockets, and those are middle-class and low-income families.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:54:49 p.m.
- Watch
Uqaqtittiji, in 2011, the Conservatives changed the food mail program that went from helping people in the north to subsidizing rich corporations in the south. Everyone knows it is not working, but the Liberals refuse to reform it.
The North West Company and the CEO make millions in profits and bonuses, but people in the north cannot afford to eat. When will the Liberals finally reform the Conservatives' broken nutrition north program so it helps people to afford healthy food?
80 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:55:27 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we know that the affordability of food and nutrition is so important in the north. We are committed 100% that 100% of the retail subsidy will go to northerners. We are currently doing an internal review of nutrition north. Once that is done, we will do an external audit. We are committed that 100% of the retail benefit will go to northerners.
64 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:55:57 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, families in Nanaimo—Ladysmith are struggling to keep up with rising food prices, yet the Liberals have done nothing to lower the costs, and the Conservatives would rather protect CEO profits. The NDP is giving them a chance today to help Canadians. They can either support our motion to cap the cost of essential foods, or keep protecting CEO profits while families go hungry. Which will they choose?
71 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:56:28 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I agree with my colleague that food prices are difficult for many families across this country, but they got a bit of good news today, and 4.75 is the number that Canadians will remember. However, if the member really wants to help, she should ask all the members, especially on the opposition, to support us in pushing Walmart and Costco to adopt the grocery code of conduct.
On this side of the House, we have been pushing for more competition, because we know that more competition will bring stabilizing prices, will bring more choice for consumers, and will make sure that, over time, Canadians will win on that. We are committed at every step of the way to fight for Canadians. I know that the Conservatives will vote against that, but we will fight for Canadians.
139 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:57:14 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as we mark the beginning of Pride season, it is a time to celebrate the 2SLGBTQ+ community and reflect on their accomplishments. However, we know that the rise of hate directed toward this community has made many feel unsafe. Could the Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Youth update the House on our government's efforts to create a safer and more inclusive Canada?
67 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:57:44 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for her advocacy.
As we raised the Pride flag a couple of days ago, I announced $1.5 million to offset security costs for Pride festivals right across the country. It is not the kind of announcement I ever want to make, but the queer community feels directly what security agencies tell us: Hate is on the rise.
The community asked for help, and we responded. At a time when we are seeing less support for queer communities, our government will never waver. On this side of the House, we support Canadians, no matter who they are, for being their authentic selves.
110 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:58:25 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, who is Randy?
The Minister of Employment has a 50% stake in a PPE company embroiled in allegations of fraud. Text messages from the COO reveal that a partner named “Randy” was involved in one of those shady business deals. The minister assures us that it is not him, yet somehow he is unable to identify who the other Randy is amongst a handful of employees.
So, again, who is Randy?
75 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:59:02 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, of course Canada has among the toughest, most stringent ethics and conflict of interest provisions in the world for public office holders. The minister in question appeared yesterday before committee for one hour and answered all of those questions.
41 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 2:59:27 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there is no trace of this other Randy. Global News cannot find him, the COO claims there is this other Randy, but, conveniently, has forgotten his last name and the minister cannot identify him among a handful of employees. This is a farce. Everyone knows who Randy is.
Will the minister just stand up and admit it is him?
61 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 3:00:08 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I will repeat it in French for the member: Canada has among the most stringent ethics and conflict of interest provisions in the world for public office holders.
The minister in question appeared yesterday before the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics for one hour and answered all of those questions.
56 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 3:00:32 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the NDP-Liberal minister from Edmonton wants Canadians to think that he is not breaking the law, but he was cashing cheques from a company that was lobbying his government and a company that he owns 50% of was winning government contracts using his name as the minister. He is not allowed to do either.
In a Global News report this week, text messages reveal someone named Randy at his company was part of a $500,000 fraud. The minister said it was not him, that it was the other Randy. Of course, it was.
Who is the other Randy and what is his last name?
108 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 3:01:03 p.m.
- Watch
I would caution members to be careful in using the proper names of individuals in the chamber.
The hon. government House leader.
22 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 3:01:21 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I, of course, just answered that question, so I would invite the member to move on.
18 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/5/24 3:01:31 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, we have the same suspicion as the Speaker does, that in fact there is perhaps some concern about using the member's name, but while the government House leader wants to hide his member, I am going to run through a scenario here. What are the chances that the other Randy is just the minister from Edmonton in a rubber nose and a stick-on moustache? I would say about 100%. He broke the Conflict of Interest Act, he broke the Lobbying Act, he broke the Criminal Code.
We want to know. Will the real Randy please stand up?
101 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
