SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Dave Epp

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Chatham-Kent—Leamington
  • Ontario
  • Voting Attendance: 65%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $153,134.70

  • Government Page
  • May/31/24 10:45:54 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I want to acknowledge the preparation that goes into the work that all members in this chamber do. I also want to acknowledge the hard work of our municipal politicians. As I said in my speech, moving the election date ahead, or even calling it anytime, would avoid exactly those conflicts regarding the date. I appreciate the member's and everyone else's hard work in this chamber.
70 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/26/24 5:16:40 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I could go into my stump speech about how resolution mechanisms are different in different situations. I am very familiar with that in the ag situation, where different marketing mechanisms are used in different sectors based upon four factors. I will not get into all of them, but one set of circumstances does not lead itself to the same outcome when it comes to dispute resolution.
68 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/3/23 10:35:22 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill S-6 
Madam Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for his intervention, and I want to compliment him on both the rapidity and the simplicity of his speech. Because I do not understand the French language well enough, I also want to compliment our interpreter services for providing a very simple way for me to understand. I actually have a two-part question for the member. First of all, given the plainness he used so that I was able to understand, I would expect the member would be able to support our Conservative initiatives, when we form government, for plain-language laws, which would reduce a lot of bureaucratic language. Second, I was a bit confused by the member's constant points about removing duplicity in terms of having two departments looking at different things. Would he then want 10 departments or 13 departments looking after the various aspects of provincial law, or would it be better to have just one federal aspect?
161 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/27/23 11:05:10 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-11 
Madam Speaker, on the platforms, it is my understanding that it is the level of use by the users that determines the prioritization and not the platforms. The algorithms are driven by those who are using and viewing. It is by the users. It is the freedom to choose what one sees. That is what is driving the algorithms behind it, and that is exactly what we want to see. We want to see that freedom of the users of the content: the hearers. That is what this legislation would be impacting. It is not the freedom of speech as much as the users.
104 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/27/23 10:36:06 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-11 
Madam Speaker, we have heard all evening that this bill would not regulate or diminish freedom of speech. What I heard in the member's speech was that freedom of speech includes the right to be heard. I am wondering if he could expand on that. Those two concepts must go together.
52 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/18/22 10:09:56 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, as the member knows, this side of the House did support the returning of tax to constituents. However, when I opened my speech yesterday, I said that the fall economic statement presented an opportunity for the government to make hard decisions. It did not. Now consumers and Canadians have to make those hard decisions. In the end, the more the government spends, the more things cost. It is as simple as that.
74 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/16/22 5:15:02 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-11 
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my colleague for his excellent analytical speech. In responding to the questions from my colleague across the aisle, he shared that there are aspects of the bill that we share with the government in terms of the intent of the legislation. Could he comment as to why the government wants to go that much further in regulating user content?
65 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border