- Member of Parliament
- Liberal
- Papineau
- Quebec
- Voting Attendance: 52%
- Expenses Last Quarter: $150,883.83
- Government Page
- Sep/16/24 2:32:20 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois claims to speak for the Government of Quebec but does not seem to acknowledge that the Government of Quebec admitted that it was going to issue an order to clarify and explain that it did not intend to attack anglophones. We are still awaiting that explanation. However, if the Government of Quebec could acknowledge it, maybe the Bloc Québécois could do likewise.
Seniors 65 and over who received dental care could not care less about their area of responsibility. They want the dental care that Quebec was not providing. The federal government is there to pay for seniors and help them get dental care. The Bloc Québécois voted against it.
127 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/16/24 2:30:42 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, as we have said before, seniors aged 75 and up have more expenses and often have less savings. That is why we are providing additional funding for them.
However, I am a bit confused about something. The Bloc Québécois claims to care about seniors aged 65 and up, but they voted against the dental care we are providing Canadians. A total of 650,000 Canadian seniors across the country have recently received dental care paid for by the federal government, but the Bloc voted against that. They do not give a damn about seniors.
100 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Oct/25/23 3:18:27 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle for her important question and for her work with seniors.
When it comes to seniors, we are proud of our track record since 2015. Instead of raising the retirement age, we decided to keep it at 65. We increased the guaranteed income supplement. We enhanced the Canada pension plan. We increased old age security.
Older Canadians remember the Harper years, and this is exactly where they would end up again under the Conservative Party. We cannot run that risk.
91 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/8/23 2:37:46 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, while opposition members are simply focused on frightening seniors, what we actually saw 10 years ago was that they raised the age of retirement from 65 to 67 years, which we returned to 65 when we first took office. Then we moved forward with an increase in the guaranteed income supplement of 10% for the most vulnerable single seniors; that party voted against the increase.
We continue to step up in ways to support Canadian seniors right across the country and lift more of them out of poverty while Conservatives continue to argue against those investments.
98 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Feb/8/23 2:26:27 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, it is ironic that the member opposite speaks about fixing things. When we took office, one of the first things we had to do was reverse the cuts that the member had voted for that would have raised the age of retirement to 67 years old instead of 65.
We continued to step up with increasing GIS by 10% for our most vulnerable single seniors and, in the years following, we have consistently been there for seniors. Conservatives continue to call for more cuts and more austerity, while we have been there to support seniors, and we will continue to be there.
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:05:25 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the fact that seniors are living longer and longer is good news. The challenge is that, as they live longer, their expenses go up too.
That is why we recognize that seniors aged 75 and older need a little bit more help. That is why we were there to give it to them. This will not take anything away from seniors between the ages of 65 and 75 since we also increased their benefits.
We are doing a little more for the most vulnerable seniors, those who are older. I think that is exactly what Canadians expect.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/4/22 3:04:03 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, since 2015, we have always been there for seniors, whether by increasing the guaranteed income supplement by 10% for the most vulnerable seniors or by investing in programs to help them.
We have always been there. To help seniors, we brought the retirement age back down from 67, where Mr. Harper set it, to 65. We improved the CPP, and Quebec followed suit with the QPP. We increased the GIS for 900,000 seniors. We made a one‑time payment of $500 to seniors 75 and older, and we will always be there for our seniors.
99 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
